Jiang Yiqiu, Li Yang, Tao Tianqi, Li Wang, Zhang Kaibin, Gui Jianchao, Ma Yong
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1895948. doi: 10.1155/2016/1895948. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether double-row suture technique is a better option for the treatment of Haglund syndrome than single-row suture technique regarding the surgical outcomes. . Thirty-two patients with Haglund syndrome were recruited in this study. Patients were divided into Group 1 (treated with single-row suture technique) and Group 2 (treated with double-row suture technique). There were 16 patients in each group. The AOFAS-ankle-hindfoot scale, VISA-A scores, and Arner-Lindholm standard were used to assess the clinical outcomes. The pre- and postoperative X-rays were used to assess the radiological outcome. . Both AOFAS-ankle-hindfoot scale score and VISA-A score had varying degrees of improvement in both groups. In latest follow-up assessment, the Arner-Lindholm standard investigation showed there were 7 excellent, 7 good, and 2 bad outcomes in Group 1 and 12 excellent and 4 good outcomes in Group 2. In Group 2 patients, there were no more posterosuperior bony prominence of the calcaneum in post-op X-rays and there were no recurrent cases. The ankle-related scale score was statistically significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 ( = 0.029). . The double-row suture technique seems to be a better option to treat Haglund syndrome than single-row suture technique.
本研究的目的是探讨在手术效果方面,双排缝合技术治疗Haglund综合征是否比单排缝合技术更好。本研究招募了32例Haglund综合征患者。患者被分为第1组(采用单排缝合技术治疗)和第2组(采用双排缝合技术治疗)。每组各有16例患者。采用美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)踝-后足评分、VISA-A评分和阿纳-林德霍尔姆(Arner-Lindholm)标准来评估临床疗效。术前和术后的X线片用于评估影像学结果。两组的AOFAS踝-后足评分和VISA-A评分均有不同程度的改善。在最新的随访评估中,Arner-Lindholm标准调查显示,第1组有7例优、7例良和2例差的结果,第2组有12例优和4例良的结果。在第2组患者中,术后X线片显示跟骨后上骨质增生不再出现,且无复发病例。第2组的踝关节相关量表评分在统计学上显著高于第1组(P = 0.029)。双排缝合技术治疗Haglund综合征似乎比单排缝合技术更好。