Astudillo-García Carmen, Bell James J, Webster Nicole S, Glasl Bettina, Jompa Jamaluddin, Montoya Jose M, Taylor Michael W
School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Apr;19(4):1450-1462. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13647. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
The study of complex microbial communities poses unique conceptual and analytical challenges, with microbial species potentially numbering in the thousands. With transient or allochthonous microorganisms often adding to this complexity, a 'core' microbiota approach, focusing only on the stable and permanent members of the community, is becoming increasingly popular. Given the various ways of defining a core microbiota, it is prudent to examine whether the definition of the core impacts upon the results obtained. Here we used complex marine sponge microbiotas and undertook a systematic evaluation of the degree to which different factors used to define the core influenced the conclusions. Significant differences in alpha- and beta-diversity were detected using some but not all core definitions. However, findings related to host specificity and environmental quality were largely insensitive to major changes in the core microbiota definition. Furthermore, none of the applied definitions altered our perception of the ecological networks summarising interactions among bacteria within the sponges. These results suggest that, while care should still be taken in interpretation, the core microbiota approach is surprisingly robust, at least for comparing microbiotas of closely related samples.
对复杂微生物群落的研究带来了独特的概念和分析挑战,微生物物种数量可能多达数千种。由于 transient 或外来微生物常常增加了这种复杂性,一种仅关注群落中稳定和永久成员的“核心”微生物群方法正变得越来越流行。鉴于定义核心微生物群的方式多种多样,谨慎考察核心的定义是否会影响所得结果是明智的。在此,我们利用复杂的海洋海绵微生物群,对用于定义核心的不同因素影响结论的程度进行了系统评估。使用某些但并非所有核心定义时,检测到了α-多样性和β-多样性的显著差异。然而,与宿主特异性和环境质量相关的发现对核心微生物群定义的主要变化基本不敏感。此外,所应用的定义均未改变我们对总结海绵内细菌间相互作用的生态网络的认识。这些结果表明,尽管在解释时仍应谨慎,但核心微生物群方法出人意料地稳健,至少对于比较密切相关样本的微生物群而言是如此。