Notarnicola A, Maccagnano G, Tafuri S, Gallone M F, Moretti L, Moretti B
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Organs of Sense, Course of Motor and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Study of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Organs of Sense, Orthopedics Section, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Study of Bari, General Hospital, Bari, Italy.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2016 Oct-Dec;30(4):1157-1164.
High energy laser therapy (HELT) could be a new alternative treatment for lower back pain (LBP), which is a significant public health problem. Nevertheless, differences between the various light waves of HELT have not yet been fully researched. Sixty-six patients with lower back pain were treated using a high energy laser therapy. They were randomized into three different protocols which differed according to wave length (650 nm, 810 nm and TRIAX, which is simultaneous emission of 810 nm, 980 nm e 1064 nm). The other parameters remained constant (5 W and 50 J/cm2 for ten daily sessions). The visual analogue scale (VAS), the Roland Scale, and the Oswestry Score were measured before treatment (T0), and at end of the treatment session (T1) and 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2) and 4 months of follow-up (T4). In each group we verified a statistically significant improvement over time and that there was a relationship between the time and treatment (p less than 0.01). At T1 for all wavelengths we found a statistically significant improvement of three scores (p less than 0.01), which was maintained up to T4. The group treated with 810 nm HELT, showed a better remission of pain on the VAS scale, and disability on the Oswestry Scale at T4 (p=0.01). Comparing T0-T1 the variation in the Roland Score was significant in the patients treated with 810 nm (p less than 0.01). All the wavelengths analyzed proved to be efficacious for LBP. The greater efficacy of 810 nm in promoting nerve regeneration and in modulating the nociception transmission could explain the better outcomes.
高能激光疗法(HELT)可能是治疗下背痛(LBP)的一种新的替代疗法,下背痛是一个重大的公共卫生问题。然而,HELT不同光波之间的差异尚未得到充分研究。66名下背痛患者接受了高能激光疗法治疗。他们被随机分为三种不同方案,这些方案根据波长不同而有所差异(650纳米、810纳米以及TRIAX,即810纳米、980纳米和1064纳米的同时发射)。其他参数保持不变(每天治疗10次,功率5瓦,能量密度50焦/平方厘米)。在治疗前(T0)、治疗结束时(T1)以及随访1个月(T1)、2个月(T2)和4个月(T4)时测量视觉模拟量表(VAS)、罗兰量表和奥斯威斯利评分。在每组中,我们验证了随着时间推移有统计学意义的改善,并且时间与治疗之间存在关联(p小于0.01)。在T1时,所有波长组的三项评分均有统计学意义的改善(p小于0. .01),这种改善一直持续到T4。接受810纳米HELT治疗的组在T4时在VAS量表上疼痛缓解更好,在奥斯威斯利量表上残疾程度改善更明显(p = 0.01)。比较T0 - T1时,接受810纳米治疗的患者罗兰评分变化具有显著性(p小于0.01)。所有分析的波长对下背痛均有效。810纳米在促进神经再生和调节伤害性感受传递方面的更大功效可以解释更好的治疗效果。