Schauperl Michael, Czodrowski Paul, Fuchs Julian E, Huber Roland G, Waldner Birgit J, Podewitz Maren, Kramer Christian, Liedl Klaus R
Institute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck , Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Discovery Technologies, Merck Serono Research, Merck Serono R&D, Merck KGaA , Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
J Chem Inf Model. 2017 Feb 27;57(2):345-354. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00483. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
The anomalous binding modes of five highly similar fragments of TIE2 inhibitors, showing three distinct binding poses, are investigated. We report a quantitative rationalization for the changes in binding pose based on molecular dynamics simulations. We investigated five fragments in complex with the transforming growth factor β receptor type 1 kinase domain. Analyses of these simulations using Grid Inhomogeneous Solvation Theory (GIST), pK calculations, and a tool to investigate enthalpic differences upon binding unraveled the various thermodynamic contributions to the different binding modes. While one binding mode flip can be rationalized by steric repulsion, the second binding pose flip revealed a different protonation state for one of the ligands, leading to different enthalpic and entropic contributions to the binding free energy. One binding pose is stabilized by the displacement of entropically unfavored water molecules (binding pose determined by solvation entropy), ligands in the other binding pose are stabilized by strong enthalpic interactions, overcompensating the unfavorable water entropy in this pose (binding pose determined by enthalpic interactions). This analysis elucidates unprecedented details determining the flipping of the binding modes, which can elegantly explain the experimental findings for this system.
研究了5个高度相似的TIE2抑制剂片段的异常结合模式,这些片段呈现出三种不同的结合姿态。我们基于分子动力学模拟报告了结合姿态变化的定量合理化解释。我们研究了与转化生长因子β受体1型激酶结构域复合的5个片段。使用网格非均匀溶剂化理论(GIST)、pK计算以及一种研究结合时焓变的工具对这些模拟进行分析,揭示了不同结合模式的各种热力学贡献。虽然一种结合模式的翻转可以通过空间排斥来合理化解释,但第二种结合姿态的翻转揭示了其中一个配体的不同质子化状态,导致对结合自由能的焓和熵贡献不同。一种结合姿态通过熵不利的水分子的置换而稳定(结合姿态由溶剂化熵决定),另一种结合姿态中的配体通过强烈的焓相互作用稳定,补偿了该姿态中不利的水熵(结合姿态由焓相互作用决定)。该分析阐明了决定结合模式翻转的前所未有的细节,这可以巧妙地解释该系统的实验结果。