• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对不文明行为暴露程度和频率进行分类:一种实现更有意义干预的新方法。

Categorizing the Magnitude and Frequency of Exposure to Uncivil Behaviors: A New Approach for More Meaningful Interventions.

作者信息

Evans Dena

机构信息

Associate Director, Undergraduate Division, UNC Charlotte School of Nursing, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Mar;49(2):214-222. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12275. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1111/jnu.12275
PMID:28079970
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine turnover intentions, as well as the prevalence and frequency of uncivil behaviors, from the perspective of registered nurses, respiratory therapists, and imaging professionals, using a new method to categorize exposure magnitude.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were collected using the 22-item Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised (NAQ-R). Additional items, informed by Price and Mueller's causal model of turnover, were included, as were select demographic variables. The final sample included 170 healthcare professionals. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample, a chi-square test was constructed to test for significant differences in exposure to uncivil behavior based on demographics, and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel statistics were used to test associations between variables and calculation of raw sum scores to implement a new method of analysis for the NAQ-R, allowing for categorization of exposure magnitude.

FINDINGS

Exposure to uncivil behavior was reported more often among nursing staff than other healthcare professionals. Lack of exposure to uncivil behavior was a significant predictor of intention to stay. Perceptual differences were found between nurses prepared at the baccalaureate and associate degree levels. Lastly, no significant correlations between exposure to uncivil behavior and selected demographic variables were found, suggesting that exposure is not dependent upon age, race, unit type, or educational level.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings support prior research associating negative organizational climate with higher turnover intentions. Uncivil behavior was reported across the organization, most predominantly among units staffed with nurses. Finally, use of newly defined cutoff points for the NAQ-R provide organizations with the ability to use both subjective and objective data to identify targets of uncivil behaviors to construct meaningful interventions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

There is a need to develop more meaningful interventions to support targets of uncivil behaviors. Use of the NAQ-R, coupled with the proposed cutoff scores, allows for the identification of targets, the magnitude of exposure, and the construction of meaningful primary, secondary, and tertiary intervention programs that may improve turnover and quality of care.

摘要

目的

从注册护士、呼吸治疗师和影像专业人员的角度,使用一种新的方法对暴露程度进行分类,来研究离职意图以及不文明行为的发生率和频率。

设计与方法

使用22项修订版负面行为问卷(NAQ-R)收集数据。纳入了受普莱斯和穆勒离职因果模型启发的其他项目,以及选定的人口统计学变量。最终样本包括170名医疗保健专业人员。描述性统计用于描述样本,构建卡方检验以检验基于人口统计学的不文明行为暴露的显著差异, Cochr an-Mantel-Haenszel统计用于检验变量之间的关联,并计算原始总分以实施NAQ-R的一种新分析方法,从而实现对暴露程度的分类。

结果

与其他医疗保健专业人员相比,护理人员报告的不文明行为暴露更为频繁。未经历不文明行为是留任意向的一个重要预测因素。在拥有学士学位和副学士学位的护士之间发现了认知差异。最后,未发现不文明行为暴露与选定的人口统计学变量之间存在显著相关性,这表明暴露并不取决于年龄、种族、科室类型或教育水平。

结论

研究结果支持了先前将负面组织氛围与较高离职意图相关联的研究。整个组织都存在不文明行为,最主要发生在有护士的科室。最后,使用NAQ-R新定义的临界值使组织能够利用主观和客观数据来识别不文明行为的目标,以构建有意义的干预措施。

临床意义

需要制定更有意义的干预措施来支持不文明行为的目标人群。使用NAQ-R并结合提议的临界分数,能够识别目标人群、暴露程度,并构建有意义的一级、二级和三级干预项目,这可能会改善人员流动和护理质量。

相似文献

1
Categorizing the Magnitude and Frequency of Exposure to Uncivil Behaviors: A New Approach for More Meaningful Interventions.对不文明行为暴露程度和频率进行分类:一种实现更有意义干预的新方法。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Mar;49(2):214-222. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12275. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
2
Bullying (ijime) among Japanese hospital nurses: modeling responses to the revised Negative Acts Questionnaire.日本医院护士中的欺凌(ijime):对修订后的负面行为问卷的反应建模。
Nurs Res. 2010 Mar-Apr;59(2):110-8. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181d1a709.
3
Relationship between ethical work climate and nurses' perception of organizational support, commitment, job satisfaction and turnover intent.道德工作氛围与护士对组织支持、承诺、工作满意度及离职意愿的认知之间的关系。
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Mar;24(2):151-166. doi: 10.1177/0969733015594667. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
4
Factors affecting nursing students' incivility: As perceived by students and faculty staff.影响护生不文明行为的因素:学生和教职员工的看法
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:118-23. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.014. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
5
Examining the Influence of Workplace Incivility on Nurses' Patient Safety Competence.审视工作场所粗言秽语对护士患者安全能力的影响。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2020 May;52(3):292-300. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12553. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
6
Incorporating a Civility Program Into a Healthcare System: Journey or Expedition?将礼仪项目融入医疗体系:是旅程还是探险?
Clin Nurse Spec. 2021;35(4):171-179. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000603.
7
Incivility among intensive care nurses: the effects of an educational intervention.重症监护护士中的不文明行为:一项教育干预的效果
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2014 Sep-Oct;33(5):293-301. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000061.
8
Who's uncivil to who? Perceptions of incivility in pre-licensure nursing programs.谁对谁不文明?对预执照护理项目中不文明行为的认知。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Nov;27:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
9
Incivility in the Emergency Department: Implications for Nurse Leaders.急诊科的无礼行为:对护士长的影响。
J Nurs Adm. 2018 Jan;48(1):8-10. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000563.
10
Influence of workplace incivility on the quality of nursing care.工作场所不文明行为对护理质量的影响。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Dec;28(23-24):4582-4594. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15051. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the behavior of bystanders to workplace bullying in healthcare-A qualitative descriptive interview study.影响医疗保健行业工作场所欺凌旁观者行为的因素:定性描述性访谈研究。
Res Nurs Health. 2022 Aug;45(4):424-432. doi: 10.1002/nur.22228. Epub 2022 Apr 15.