Suppr超能文献

EndOclear装置对气管内导管生物膜的影响。

Effect of the endOclear Device on Biofilm in Endotracheal Tubes.

作者信息

Bardes James M, Gray Dana, Wilson Alison

机构信息

1 Division of Trauma, Acute Care Surgery and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, West Virginia University , Morgantown, West Virginia.

2 Division of Pathology, West Virginia University , Morgantown, West Virginia.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Apr;18(3):293-298. doi: 10.1089/sur.2016.052. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Organisms trapped in biofilms cause more than 80% of medical infections. Significant investments are being made to develop methods of removing these biofilms. The endOclear device is reported to remove biofilm from endotracheal tubes (ETTs) and to decrease pneumonia rates and ventilator time.

METHODS

This was an observational study performed at a university Level 1 trauma center intensive care unit. A series of 40 ETTs were collected at extubation, with half of the patients having been treated daily with the endOclear device. Biofilms were quantified from a standardized point on the distal ETT. The patients' standard and biofilm cultures were reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean hours of intubation for the control group was 135 and for the device group 138. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.91). Eleven patients in the device group were found to have pneumonia compared with six in the control group (p = 0.34). Ventilator data after device use showed a mean increase of 29.9 cc in tidal volume and a mean decrease in peak pressures of 0.39 cm HO. Comparisons between biofilm stage or hours of intubation and a diagnosis of pneumonia found no correlation. Only nine of 40 ETTs had congruence between the microbiata of the biofilm and standard bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, a divergence rate of 78%.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of the endOclear group and controls demonstrated a trend toward a higher pneumonia rate in the former. Additionally, the device achieved very small, clinically insignificant, changes in ventilator settings, and no difference was seen in the time on the ventilator. Comparisons between biofilm and standard BAL cultures continue to show the biofilm is more diverse than previously thought. In this study, no statistical significance was found between biofilm stage and the pneumonia rate. This study provides additional evidence that there is no correlation between biofilm stage and duration of intubation.

摘要

背景

生物膜中困住的微生物导致超过80%的医疗感染。目前正在投入大量资金研发去除这些生物膜的方法。据报道,endOclear设备可从气管内导管(ETT)上去除生物膜,并降低肺炎发生率和缩短呼吸机使用时间。

方法

这是一项在大学一级创伤中心重症监护病房进行的观察性研究。拔管时收集了一系列40根ETT,其中一半患者每天使用endOclear设备进行治疗。从ETT远端的一个标准化点对生物膜进行定量分析。回顾了患者的标准培养和生物膜培养情况。

结果

对照组的平均插管时间为135小时,设备组为138小时。这种差异无统计学意义(p = 0.91)。设备组有11名患者发生肺炎,而对照组有6名(p = 0.34)。使用设备后的呼吸机数据显示潮气量平均增加29.9毫升,峰值压力平均降低0.39厘米水柱。生物膜阶段或插管时间与肺炎诊断之间的比较未发现相关性。40根ETT中只有9根生物膜的微生物群与标准支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)液一致,差异率为78%。

结论

endOclear组与对照组的比较表明,前者有肺炎发生率较高的趋势。此外,该设备在呼吸机设置上实现的变化非常小,临床上无显著意义,且在呼吸机使用时间上未发现差异。生物膜与标准BAL培养的比较继续表明,生物膜比以前认为的更加多样化。在本研究中,生物膜阶段与肺炎发生率之间未发现统计学意义。这项研究提供了额外的证据,表明生物膜阶段与插管持续时间之间没有相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验