Schulz André, Schilling Thomas M, Vögele Claus, Larra Mauro F, Schächinger Hartmut
Institute for Health and Behaviour, Research Unit INSIDE, University of Luxembourg, 11, Porte des Sciences, 4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
Division of Clinical Psychophysiology, Institute of Psychobiology, University of Trier, Johanniterufer 15, 54290 Trier, Germany.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 19;371(1708). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0019. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
Current approaches to assess interoception of respiratory functions cannot differentiate between the physiological basis of interoception, i.e. visceral-afferent signal processing, and the psychological process of attention focusing. Furthermore, they typically involve invasive procedures, e.g. induction of respiratory occlusions or the inhalation of CO-enriched air. The aim of this study was to test the capacity of startle methodology to reflect respiratory-related afferent signal processing, independent of invasive procedures. Forty-two healthy participants were tested in a spontaneous breathing and in a 0.25 Hz paced breathing condition. Acoustic startle noises of 105 dB(A) intensity (50 ms white noise) were presented with identical trial frequency at peak and on-going inspiration and expiration, based on a new pattern detection method, involving the online processing of the respiratory belt signal. The results show the highest startle magnitudes during on-going expiration compared with any other measurement points during the respiratory cycle, independent of whether breathing was spontaneous or paced. Afferent signals from slow adapting phasic pulmonary stretch receptors may be responsible for this effect. This study is the first to demonstrate startle modulation by respiration. These results offer the potential to apply startle methodology in the non-invasive testing of interoception-related aspects in respiratory psychophysiology.This article is part of the themed issue 'Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health'.
当前评估呼吸功能内感受的方法无法区分内感受的生理基础,即内脏传入信号处理,与注意力聚焦的心理过程。此外,它们通常涉及侵入性程序,例如诱导呼吸阻塞或吸入富含一氧化碳的空气。本研究的目的是测试惊吓方法反映与呼吸相关的传入信号处理的能力,而不依赖于侵入性程序。42名健康参与者在自主呼吸和0.25Hz的节律性呼吸条件下接受测试。基于一种新的模式检测方法,在峰值、吸气和呼气过程中,以相同的试验频率呈现强度为105dB(A)的听觉惊吓噪声(50ms白噪声),该方法涉及呼吸带信号的在线处理。结果显示,与呼吸周期中的任何其他测量点相比,在持续呼气过程中惊吓幅度最高,无论呼吸是自主的还是节律性的。来自慢适应性相性肺牵张感受器的传入信号可能是造成这种效应的原因。本研究首次证明了呼吸对惊吓的调节作用。这些结果为将惊吓方法应用于呼吸心理生理学中与内感受相关方面的非侵入性测试提供了可能性。本文是主题为“超越内环境稳态的内感受:情感、认知和心理健康”的特刊的一部分。