Rumbus Zoltan, Matics Robert, Hegyi Peter, Zsiboras Csaba, Szabo Imre, Illes Anita, Petervari Erika, Balasko Marta, Marta Katalin, Miko Alexandra, Parniczky Andrea, Tenk Judit, Rostas Ildiko, Solymar Margit, Garami Andras
Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Department of Translational Medicine, First Department of Medicine, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0170152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170152. eCollection 2017.
Sepsis is usually accompanied by changes of body temperature (Tb), but whether fever and hypothermia predict mortality equally or differently is not fully clarified. We aimed to find an association between Tb and mortality in septic patients with meta-analysis of clinical trials.
We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry databases (from inception to February 2016). Human studies reporting Tb and mortality of patients with sepsis were included in the analyses. Average Tb with SEM and mortality rate of septic patient groups were extracted by two authors independently.
Forty-two studies reported Tb and mortality ratios in septic patients (n = 10,834). Pearson correlation analysis revealed weak negative linear correlation (R2 = 0.2794) between Tb and mortality. With forest plot analysis, we found a 22.2% (CI, 19.2-25.5) mortality rate in septic patients with fever (Tb > 38.0°C), which was higher, 31.2% (CI, 25.7-37.3), in normothermic patients, and it was the highest, 47.3% (CI, 38.9-55.7), in hypothermic patients (Tb < 36.0°C). Meta-regression analysis showed strong negative linear correlation between Tb and mortality rate (regression coefficient: -0.4318; P < 0.001). Mean Tb of the patients was higher in the lowest mortality quartile than in the highest: 38.1°C (CI, 37.9-38.4) vs 37.1°C (CI, 36.7-37.4).
Deep Tb shows negative correlation with the clinical outcome in sepsis. Fever predicts lower, while hypothermia higher mortality rates compared with normal Tb. Septic patients with the lowest (< 25%) chance of mortality have higher Tb than those with the highest chance (> 75%).
脓毒症通常伴有体温(Tb)变化,但发热和体温过低对死亡率的预测作用是否相同或不同尚未完全明确。我们旨在通过对临床试验的荟萃分析,找出脓毒症患者体温与死亡率之间的关联。
我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验注册数据库(从创建至2016年2月)。分析纳入了报告脓毒症患者体温和死亡率的人体研究。由两位作者独立提取脓毒症患者组的平均体温及标准误(SEM)和死亡率。
42项研究报告了脓毒症患者的体温和死亡率比值(n = 10,834)。Pearson相关分析显示体温与死亡率之间存在弱负线性相关(R2 = 0.2794)。通过森林图分析,我们发现发热(Tb > 38.0°C)的脓毒症患者死亡率为22.2%(CI,19.2 - 25.5),体温正常的患者死亡率更高,为31.2%(CI,25.7 - 37.3),体温过低(Tb < 36.0°C)的患者死亡率最高,为47.3%(CI,38.9 - 55.7)。荟萃回归分析显示体温与死亡率之间存在强负线性相关(回归系数:-0.4318;P < 0.001)。死亡率最低的四分位数患者的平均体温高于死亡率最高的四分位数患者:38.1°C(CI,37.9 - 38.4)对37.1°C(CI,36.7 - 37.4)。
深部体温与脓毒症的临床结局呈负相关。与正常体温相比,发热预示死亡率较低,而体温过低预示死亡率较高。死亡率最低(< 25%)的脓毒症患者体温高于死亡率最高(> 75%)的患者。