Kocherginsky Masha, Huisingh-Scheetz Megan, Dale William, Lauderdale Diane S, Waite Linda
University of Chicago Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
University of Chicago Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0170082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170082. eCollection 2017.
Accelerometers are increasingly used in research. Four to 7 days of monitoring is preferred to estimate average activity but may be burdensome for older adults. We aimed to investigate: 1) 7-day accelerometry protocol adherence, 2) demographic predictors of adherence, 3) day of the week effect, and 4) average activity calculated from 7 versus fewer days among older adults.
We used the 2003-2006 older adult hip accelerometry data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) sample. We determined proportions with 1-7 valid (10-20 hours) wear days and identified wear day correlates using ordinal logistic regression. We determined the day of week effect on 5 accelerometry measures (counts per minute, CPM; % sedentary behavior; % light-lifestyle activity; % moderate-vigorous activity, MVPA; total activity counts) using multivariate linear regression and compared averages estimated over 2 or 3 versus 7 days using correlations, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plots.
Among 2,208 participants aged 65+, 85% of participants had ≥2 and 44% had 7 valid wear days. Increasing age (p = 0.01) and non-white race (p < 0.001) were associated with fewer days. Daily CPM, % MVPA, and total daily activity counts were similar Monday through Saturday, but significantly lower on Sundays (p < 0.001). Daily % sedentary behavior and % light-lifestyle activity were significantly different on Saturdays (p = 0.04-0.045) and Sundays (p < 0.001) compared to weekdays. Among participants with 7 valid days, 2 or 3 day averages were highly correlated with 7 day averages for all 5 accelerometry measures (2 versus 7 days: r = 0.90-0.93, 3 versus 7 days: r = 0.94-0.96).
Protocols of 2-3 days, adjusting for Sundays (average CPM, % moderate-vigorous activity, and average total daily activity counts) or weekends (% sedentary behavior and % light-lifestyle activity), give reliable estimates of older adult activity.
加速度计在研究中的应用日益广泛。为估算平均活动量,监测4至7天较为理想,但这对老年人来说可能负担较重。我们旨在研究:1)7天加速度计监测方案的依从性;2)依从性的人口统计学预测因素;3)一周中各天的影响;4)老年人中7天与少于7天计算出的平均活动量。
我们使用了美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)样本中2003 - 2006年老年人髋部加速度计数据。我们确定了有1 - 7个有效(10 - 20小时)佩戴日的比例,并使用有序逻辑回归确定佩戴日的相关因素。我们使用多元线性回归确定一周中各天对5项加速度计测量指标(每分钟计数,CPM;久坐行为百分比;轻度生活方式活动百分比;中度至剧烈活动百分比,MVPA;总活动计数)的影响,并使用相关性、线性回归和布兰德 - 奥特曼图比较2天或3天与7天估算出的平均值。
在2208名65岁及以上的参与者中,85%的参与者有≥2个有效佩戴日,44%的参与者有7个有效佩戴日。年龄增加(p = 0.01)和非白人种族(p < 0.001)与佩戴日较少有关。周一至周六的每日CPM、MVPA百分比和每日总活动计数相似,但周日显著较低(p < 0.001)。与工作日相比,周六(p = 0.04 - 0.045)和周日(p < 0.001)的每日久坐行为百分比和轻度生活方式活动百分比有显著差异。在有7个有效日的参与者中,对于所有5项加速度计测量指标,2天或3天的平均值与7天的平均值高度相关(2天与7天:r = 0.90 - 0.93,3天与7天:r = 0.94 - 0.96)。
2 - 3天的方案,针对周日(平均CPM、中度至剧烈活动百分比和每日总活动计数平均值)或周末(久坐行为百分比和轻度生活方式活动百分比)进行调整,能可靠地估算老年人的活动量。