Evenson Kelly R, Wen Fang, Metzger Jesse S, Herring Amy H
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 137 East Franklin Street, Suite 306, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Center for Behavioral Health Research and Services, University of Alaska - Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 15;12:20. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0183-7.
This study described the patterns of accelerometer-determined physical activity and sedentary behavior among adults using a nationally representative sample from the United States.
Using 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data, 7931 adults at least 18 years old wore an ActiGraph accelerometer for one week, providing at least 3 days of wear for >=8 hours/day. Cutpoints defined moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA; >= 2020 and >=760 counts/minute), vigorous physical activity (> = 5999 counts/minute), and sedentary behavior (<100 counts/minute). Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to estimate patterns of physical activity and sedentary behavior. All estimates were weighted to reflect the United States population.
For weighted percent of MVPA out of total wearing time, 5 classes were identified from least to most active: 65.3% of population (weighted mean 9.3 minutes/day), 24.9% (32.1 minutes/day), 3.2% that was low on the weekdays but much higher on the weekends (52.0 minutes/day), 5.9% (59.9 minutes/day), and 0.7% in the highest class (113.6 minutes/day). Using the lower MVPA threshold, 6 classes emerged with each class ranging in population from 1.2% to 43.6%. A vigorous activity class could not be derived due to low prevalence. For weighted percent of sedentary behavior out of total wearing time, 5 classes were identified from most to least sedentary: 6.3% of population (weighted mean 660.2 minutes/day), 25.1% (546.8 minutes/day), 37.7% (453.9 minutes/day), 24.0% (354.8 minutes/day), and 7.0% (256.3 minutes/day). Four of the classes showed generally similar results across every day of the week, with the absolute percents differing across classes. In contrast, the least sedentary class showing a marked rise in percent of time spent in sedentary behavior on the weekend (weighted mean 336.7-346.5 minutes/day) compared to weekdays (weighted mean 255.2-292.4 minutes/day).
The LCA models provided a data reduction process to identify patterns using minute-by-minute accelerometry data in order to explore meaningful contrasts. The models supported 5 or 6 distinct patterns for MVPA and sedentary behavior. These physical activity and sedentary behavior patterns can be used as intervention targets and as independent or dependent variables in future studies of correlates, determinants, or outcomes.
本研究利用来自美国的具有全国代表性的样本,描述了成年人中通过加速度计测定的身体活动和久坐行为模式。
利用2003 - 2006年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)数据,7931名至少18岁的成年人佩戴ActiGraph加速度计一周,每天佩戴至少3天,且每天佩戴时间≥8小时。切点定义了中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA;≥2020次/分钟和≥760次/分钟)、剧烈身体活动(≥5999次/分钟)和久坐行为(<100次/分钟)。潜在类别分析(LCA)用于估计身体活动和久坐行为模式。所有估计值均进行加权以反映美国人口情况。
对于总佩戴时间中MVPA的加权百分比,从最不活跃到最活跃共识别出5类:65.3%的人群(加权均值为每天9.3分钟)、24.9%(每天32.1分钟)、3.2%的人群在工作日较低但周末高得多(每天52.0分钟)、5.9%(每天59.9分钟)以及最高类别中的0.7%(每天113.6分钟)。使用较低的MVPA阈值时,出现了6类,每类人群占比从1.2%到43.6%不等。由于患病率较低,无法得出一个剧烈活动类别。对于总佩戴时间中久坐行为的加权百分比,从最久坐到最不久坐共识别出5类:6.3%的人群(加权均值为每天660.2分钟)、25.1%(每天546.8分钟)、37.7%(每天453.9分钟)、24.0%(每天354.8分钟)以及7.0%(每天256.3分钟)。其中四类在一周的每一天总体结果相似,只是各类别的绝对百分比不同。相比之下,最不久坐的类别在周末久坐行为所花费时间的百分比显著上升(加权均值为每天336.7 - 346.5分钟),而工作日为(加权均值为每天255.2 - 292.4分钟)。
LCA模型提供了一个数据简化过程,以利用逐分钟的加速度计数据识别模式,从而探索有意义的对比。这些模型支持MVPA和久坐行为的5种或6种不同模式。这些身体活动和久坐行为模式可作为干预目标,并在未来关于相关性、决定因素或结果的研究中作为自变量或因变量。