Deveza Leticia A, Hunter David J, Wajon Anne, Bennell Kim L, Vicenzino Bill, Hodges Paul, Eyles Jillian P, Jongs Ray, Riordan Edward A, Duong Vicky, Min Oo Win, O'Connell Rachel, Meneses Sarah R F
Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital and Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Macquarie University Clinic, Macquarie Hand Therapy, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 12;7(1):e014498. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014498.
Management of thumb base osteoarthritis (OA) using a combination of therapies is common in clinical practice; however, evidence for the efficacy of this approach is lacking. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of a combination of conservative therapies for the treatment of thumb base OA compared with an education control group.
This is a randomised, controlled, single-centre, two-arm superiority trial with 1:1 allocation ratio; with assessor and statistician blinded. Participants are blinded to the trial's hypothesis and to the interventions received by the opposite group. A total of 204 participants will be recruited from the community and randomised using a computer-generated schedule. The intervention group will receive education for joint protection and OA, a splint for the base of the thumb, hand exercises and topical diclofenac sodium 1% gel over 6 weeks. The control group will receive education for joint protection and OA alone. Main inclusion criteria are pain ≥40 mm (Visual Analogue Scale, 0-100) at the base of the thumb, impairment in hand function ≥6 (Functional Index for Hand Osteoarthritis, 0-30) and radiographic thumb base OA (Kellgren Lawrence grade ≥2). Participants currently receiving any of the intervention components will be excluded. Outcomes will be measured at 2, 6 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome is change in pain and hand function from baseline to 6 weeks. Other outcomes include changes in grip and pinch strength, quality of life, presence of joint swelling and tenderness, duration of joint stiffness, patient's global assessment and use of rescue medication. Analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Adverse events will be monitored throughout the study.
This protocol is approved by the local ethics committee (HREC/15/HAWKE/479). Dissemination will occur through presentations at international conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.
ACTRN12616000353493; Pre-results.
在临床实践中,联合多种疗法治疗拇指基底骨关节炎(OA)很常见;然而,这种方法疗效的证据尚缺。本研究旨在确定与教育对照组相比,保守疗法联合治疗拇指基底OA的效果。
这是一项随机、对照、单中心、双臂优效性试验,分配比例为1:1;评估者和统计人员设盲。参与者对试验假设及另一组接受的干预措施不知情。将从社区招募204名参与者,使用计算机生成的时间表进行随机分组。干预组将在6周内接受关节保护和OA教育、拇指基底夹板、手部锻炼以及1%双氯芬酸钠外用凝胶治疗。对照组仅接受关节保护和OA教育。主要纳入标准为拇指基底疼痛≥40mm(视觉模拟评分,0 - 100)、手部功能障碍≥6(手部骨关节炎功能指数,0 - 30)以及拇指基底OA的影像学表现(Kellgren Lawrence分级≥2)。目前正在接受任何干预成分治疗的参与者将被排除。将在2周、6周和12周时测量结果。主要结局是从基线到6周时疼痛和手部功能的变化。其他结局包括握力和捏力的变化、生活质量、关节肿胀和压痛情况、关节僵硬持续时间、患者整体评估以及急救药物的使用。将根据意向性分析原则进行分析。在整个研究过程中监测不良事件。
本方案已获当地伦理委员会批准(HREC/15/HAWKE/479)。将通过在国际会议上报告及在同行评审期刊上发表进行传播。
ACTRN12616000353493;预结果。