Robbins Sarah Rubia, Melo Luciano Ricardo S, Urban Hema, Deveza Leticia A, Asher Rebecca, Johnson Victoria L, Hunter David J
Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital and Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 26;7(12):e018495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018495.
Current guidelines recommend tailored interventions to optimise knee osteoarthritis (OA) management. However, models of care still have a 'one size fits all' approach, which is suboptimal as it ignores patient heterogeneity. This study aims to compare a stepped care strategy with standard care for overweight and obese persons with medial tibiofemoral OA.
Participants will be randomised into two groups (85 each). The intervention will receive a diet and exercise programme for 18 weeks in the first step of the study. Disease remission will then be assessed using the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). PASS is defined as the highest level of symptom beyond which patients consider themselves well and takes into account pain intensity, patient's global assessment of disease activity and degree of functional impairment. In the second step, participants in remission will continue with diet and exercise. If remission is not achieved, participants will be assigned in a hierarchical order to cognitive behavioural therapy, knee brace or muscle strengthening for 12 weeks. The intervention will be decided based on their clinical presentation for symptoms of depression and varus malalignment. Participants without depression or varus malalignment will undertake a muscle strengthening programme. The control group will receive educational material related to OA management. Main inclusion criteria are age ≥50 years, radiographic medial tibiofemoral OA, body mass index (BMI) ≥28 kg/m, knee pain ≥40 (Visual Analogue Scale, 0-100), PASS (0-100) >32 for pain and global assessment, and 31 for functional impairment. Outcomes will be measured at 20-week and 32-week visits. The primary outcome is disease remission at 32 weeks. Other outcomes include functional mobility; patient-reported outcomes; BMI; waist-hip ratio; quadriceps strength; symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress; and knee range of motion. The analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
The local ethics committee approved this protocol (HREC/14/HAWKE/381). Dissemination will occur through presentations at international conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.
ACTRN12615000227594.
当前指南推荐采用个性化干预措施以优化膝骨关节炎(OA)的管理。然而,目前的护理模式仍采用“一刀切”的方法,这种方法并不理想,因为它忽略了患者的异质性。本研究旨在比较阶梯式护理策略与标准护理对超重和肥胖的胫股内侧OA患者的效果。
参与者将被随机分为两组(每组85人)。在研究的第一步,干预组将接受为期18周的饮食和运动计划。然后使用患者可接受症状状态(PASS)评估疾病缓解情况。PASS定义为症状的最高水平,超过此水平患者认为自己状况良好,并考虑了疼痛强度、患者对疾病活动的整体评估以及功能障碍程度。在第二步中,缓解的参与者将继续进行饮食和运动。如果未实现缓解,参与者将按等级顺序被分配接受认知行为疗法、膝关节支具或肌肉强化训练,为期12周。干预措施将根据他们的抑郁症状和内翻畸形症状的临床表现来决定。没有抑郁或内翻畸形的参与者将进行肌肉强化训练计划。对照组将收到与OA管理相关的教育材料。主要纳入标准为年龄≥50岁、影像学显示胫股内侧OA、体重指数(BMI)≥28 kg/m²、膝关节疼痛≥40(视觉模拟量表,0 - 100)、疼痛和整体评估的PASS(0 - 100)>32,以及功能障碍的PASS为31。将在第20周和第32周的随访中测量结果。主要结局是32周时的疾病缓解情况。其他结局包括功能活动能力;患者报告的结局;BMI;腰臀比;股四头肌力量;抑郁、焦虑和压力症状;以及膝关节活动范围。分析将根据意向性分析原则进行。
当地伦理委员会批准了本方案(HREC/14/HAWKE/381)。传播将通过在国际会议上的报告以及在同行评审期刊上发表来进行。
ACTRN12615000227594。