• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

彩色多普勒超声在产前诊断脐带入口异常中的临床价值

Clinical value of color doppler ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis of umbilical cord entry abnormity.

作者信息

Sun Jiandong, Wang Li, Li Yinghui

机构信息

Jiandong Sun, Department of Special Inspection, Binzhou People's Hospital, Shandong, 256600, China.

Li Wang, Department of Special Inspection, Binzhou People's Hospital, Shandong, 256600, China.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Nov-Dec;32(6):1414-1418. doi: 10.12669/pjms.325.10518.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.325.10518
PMID:28083036
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5216292/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical value of prenatal diagnosis of umbilical cord entry abnormity (UCEA) by means of color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS).

METHODS

Clinical data of sixty-four cases with confirmed umbilical cord entry abnormity were reviewed and the specific UCEA conditions and the outcomes of perinatal infants were analyzed.

RESULTS

Detection rates of marginal umbilical cord entry abnormity and velamentous umbilical cord entry abnormity by means of CDUS at second trimester were 94.1% and 93.8% respecdtively much higher than 80.0% and 68.8% which were those of third trimester. Discrepancy had statistical significance (P<0.05). True positive rate of prenatal diagnosis of UCEA by means of CDUS was 85.9% (55/64), and false negative rate was 14.1% (9/64). Among sixty four patients with UCEA, seventeen patients (26.6%) underwent selective caesarean delivery; twenty-six patients (35.9%) underwent emergency caesarean delivery and twenty-four patients (37.5%) had normal delivery.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal diagnosis of UCEA by means of CDUS is intuitive and accurate. It provides an evidence for determination of the best time to diagnose UCEA, and also offers a proper advice for pregnant women about delivery mode to ensure the fetus survival rate, which is clinically valuable.

摘要

目的

探讨彩色多普勒超声(CDUS)产前诊断脐带入口异常(UCEA)的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析64例确诊为脐带入口异常患者的临床资料,分析脐带入口异常的具体情况及围产儿结局。

结果

孕中期采用CDUS诊断边缘性脐带入口异常和帆状脐带入口异常的检出率分别为94.1%和93.8%,明显高于孕晚期的80.0%和68.8%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。CDUS产前诊断UCEA的真阳性率为85.9%(55/64),假阴性率为14.1%(9/64)。64例UCEA患者中,17例(26.6%)行选择性剖宫产;26例(35.9%)行急诊剖宫产;24例(37.5%)经阴道分娩。

结论

CDUS产前诊断UCEA直观、准确,为确定UCEA的最佳诊断时机提供依据,也为孕妇选择分娩方式提供恰当建议,以确保胎儿存活率,具有临床应用价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7cb/5216292/038b82d35b51/PJMS-32-1414-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7cb/5216292/9ae436be3833/PJMS-32-1414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7cb/5216292/038b82d35b51/PJMS-32-1414-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7cb/5216292/9ae436be3833/PJMS-32-1414-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7cb/5216292/038b82d35b51/PJMS-32-1414-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical value of color doppler ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis of umbilical cord entry abnormity.彩色多普勒超声在产前诊断脐带入口异常中的临床价值
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Nov-Dec;32(6):1414-1418. doi: 10.12669/pjms.325.10518.
2
Prenatal detection of velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord: a prospective color Doppler ultrasound study.脐带帆状附着的产前检测:一项前瞻性彩色多普勒超声研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jun;21(6):564-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.132.
3
[Velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord--diagnosis and management].[脐带帆状附着——诊断与处理]
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2009;48(5):3-10.
4
Perinatal diagnostic evaluation of velamentous umbilical cord insertion: clinical, Doppler, and ultrasonic findings.帆状脐带附着的围产期诊断评估:临床、多普勒及超声检查结果
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;87(1):112-7. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00339-8.
5
Clinically Relevant Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Umbilical Cord Pathology.脐带病变的临床相关产前超声诊断
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;12(2):236. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020236.
6
Role of color flow Doppler ultrasonography in diagnosing velamentous insertion of the umbilical cord and vasa previa. A report of two cases.彩色多普勒超声在诊断脐带帆状附着及前置血管中的作用。两例报告。
J Reprod Med. 1995 Nov;40(11):804-8.
7
Current Perspectives of Prenatal Sonographic Diagnosis and Clinical Management Challenges of True Knot of the Umbilical Cord.脐带真结的产前超声诊断现状及临床管理挑战
Int J Womens Health. 2020 Mar 27;12:221-233. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S192260. eCollection 2020.
8
Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of velamentous cord insertion: a case report and review of the literature.产前超声诊断帆状脐带插入:病例报告及文献复习。
J Ultrasound. 2024 Mar;27(1):173-177. doi: 10.1007/s40477-023-00822-3. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
9
Three-dimensional power Doppler sonography in the prenatal diagnosis of a true knot of the umbilical cord: value and limitations.三维能量多普勒超声在产前诊断脐带真结中的价值与局限性
J Ultrasound Med. 2007 Sep;26(9):1215-20. doi: 10.7863/jum.2007.26.9.1215.
10
Antenatal diagnosis of velamentous umbilical cord insertion and vasa previa with color Doppler imaging.彩色多普勒成像对帆状脐带插入和前置血管的产前诊断。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Dec;12(6):426-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12060426.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Shunt rate of ductus arteriosus and ductus venosus in middle and late fetuses and their application value in the evaluation of fetal growth restriction.中晚期胎儿动脉导管及静脉导管分流率及其在胎儿生长受限评估中的应用价值
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Nov-Dec;39(6):1589-1594. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.7649.
2
Doppler Ultrasound of the Umbilical Artery: Clinical Application.彩色多谱勒超声检测脐动脉:临床应用。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 May;44(5):519-531. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743097. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
3
Clinically Relevant Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Umbilical Cord Pathology.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of vasa previa.超声诊断前置血管准确性的系统评价
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;45(5):516-22. doi: 10.1002/uog.14752. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
2
Effect of placenta previa on fetal growth restriction and stillbirth.胎盘前置对胎儿生长受限和死胎的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Aug;286(2):295-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2296-4. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
3
Placental pathology in fetal growth restriction.胎儿生长受限的胎盘病理学。
脐带病变的临床相关产前超声诊断
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;12(2):236. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020236.
4
Standardized Ultrasound Diagnosis of Nuchal Cord.脐带绕颈的标准化超声诊断
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Sep 17;14:5825-5834. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S322713. eCollection 2021.
5
Maternal obesity and stillbirth at term; placental pathology-A case control study.母体肥胖与足月死胎;胎盘病理学——病例对照研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 30;16(4):e0250983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250983. eCollection 2021.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Mar;155(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.11.017. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
4
Fetal spinal anomalies in a first-trimester sonographic screening program for aneuploidy.早孕期超声筛查胎儿脊柱异常与非整倍体。
Prenat Diagn. 2011 Jan;31(1):107-14. doi: 10.1002/pd.2608. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
5
SOGC CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE: guidelines for the management of vasa previa.SOGC 临床实践指南:帆状胎盘前置血管管理指南。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Jan;108(1):85-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.09.011.
6
Diagnosis of placental abruption: relationship between clinical and histopathological findings.胎盘早剥的诊断:临床与组织病理学表现的关系。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Feb;148(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Nov 7.
7
Test characteristics of placental location screening by transabdominal ultrasound at 18-20 weeks.孕18 - 20周经腹超声筛查胎盘位置的检查特征
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;28(7):944-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.3873.
8
Placenta previa: the role of ultrasound in assessment during third trimester.前置胎盘:超声在孕晚期评估中的作用
J Pak Med Assoc. 2004 Feb;54(2):81-3.
9
Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa: ultrasound findings and obstetric outcome in ten cases.前置血管的产前超声诊断:10例超声表现及产科结局
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Aug;18(2):109-15. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00448.x.
10
UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Fetal Medicine Foundation First Trimester Screening Group.英国多中心项目:通过孕10 - 14周时孕妇年龄和胎儿颈部透明带厚度评估21三体综合征风险。胎儿医学基金会孕早期筛查小组。
Lancet. 1998 Aug 1;352(9125):343-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6.