David-Barrett Tamas, Dunbar Robin I M
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK; Facultad de Gobierno, CICS, Universidad del Desarrollo, Av. Plaza 680, San Carlos de Apoquindo, Las Condes, Santiago de Chile 7610658, Chile; Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiellinie 66, 24105 Kiel, Germany; Population Research Institute, Väestöliitto, Kalevankatu 16, Helsinki 00101, Finland.
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK; Department of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, PO Box 15500, Espoo 00076, Finland.
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Dec 21;3(12):160259. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160259. eCollection 2016 Dec.
Social living ultimately depends on coordination between group members, and communication is necessary to make this possible. We suggest that this might have been the key selection pressure acting on the evolution of language in humans and use a behavioural coordination model to explore the impact of communication efficiency on social group coordination. We show that when language production is expensive but there is an individual benefit to the efficiency with which individuals coordinate their behaviour, the evolution of efficient communication is selected for. Contrary to some views of language evolution, the speed of evolution is necessarily slow because there is no advantage in some individuals evolving communication abilities that much exceed those of the community at large. However, once a threshold competence has been achieved, evolution of higher order language skills may indeed be precipitate.
社会生活最终依赖于群体成员之间的协调,而交流是实现这一点的必要条件。我们认为,这可能是影响人类语言进化的关键选择压力,并使用行为协调模型来探讨交流效率对社会群体协调的影响。我们表明,当语言产生成本高昂,但个体行为协调效率能带来个体利益时,高效交流的进化就会被选择。与一些语言进化观点相反,进化速度必然缓慢,因为某些个体进化出远超群体其他成员的交流能力并无优势。然而,一旦达到阈值能力,更高阶语言技能的进化可能确实会加速。