Redhead Gina, Dunbar R I M
Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Evol Psychol. 2013 Aug 14;11(4):845-54. doi: 10.1177/147470491301100409.
We test between four separate hypotheses (social gossip, social contracts, mate advertising and factual information exchange) for the function(s) of language using a recall paradigm. Subjects recalled the social content of stories (irrespective of whether this concerned social behavior, defection or romantic events) significantly better than they did ecological information. Recall rates were no better on ecological stories if they involved flamboyant language, suggesting that, if true, Miller's "Scheherazade effect" may not be independent of content. One interpretation of these results might be that language evolved as an all-purpose social tool, and perhaps acquired specialist functions (sexual advertising, contract formation, information exchange) at a later date through conventional evolutionary windows of opportunity.
我们使用回忆范式,针对语言的功能,在四个不同的假设(社交闲聊、社会契约、配偶广告和事实信息交流)之间进行测试。受试者对故事的社会内容(无论这涉及社会行为、背叛还是浪漫事件)的回忆明显优于对生态信息的回忆。如果生态故事使用了华丽的语言,其回忆率并不会更好,这表明,如果这是真的,米勒的“谢赫拉莎德效应”可能并非与内容无关。这些结果的一种解释可能是,语言最初作为一种通用的社交工具进化而来,或许后来通过传统的进化机会窗口获得了专门的功能(性广告、契约形成、信息交流)。