• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支付改革:模式分析及绩效评估影响

Payment Reform: Analysis of Models and Performance Measurement Implications.

作者信息

Schneider Eric C, Hussey Peter S, Schnyer Christopher

出版信息

Rand Health Q. 2011 Mar 1;1(1):3. eCollection 2011 Spring.

PMID:28083159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4945210/
Abstract

Insurers and purchasers of health care in the United States are on the verge of potentially revolutionary changes in the approaches they use to pay for health care. Recently, purchasers and insurers have been experimenting with payment approaches that include incentives to improve quality and reduce the use of unnecessary and costly services. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 is likely to accelerate payment reform based on performance measurement. This article provides details of the results of a technical report that catalogues nearly 100 implemented and proposed payment reform programs, classifies each of these programs into one of 11 payment reform models, and identifies the performance measurement needs associated with each model. A synthesis of the results suggests near-term priorities for performance measure development and identifies pertinent challenges related to the use of performance measures as a basis for payment reform. The report is also intended to create a shared framework for analysis of future performance measurement opportunities. This report is intended for the many stakeholders tasked with outlining a national quality strategy in the wake of health care reform legislation.

摘要

美国医疗保健的保险公司和购买者,在其支付医疗保健费用的方式上,正处在可能发生变革的边缘。最近,购买者和保险公司一直在试验各种支付方式,其中包括旨在提高质量以及减少不必要和昂贵服务使用的激励措施。2010年的《患者保护与平价医疗法案》可能会加速基于绩效评估的支付改革。本文详细介绍了一份技术报告的结果,该报告编录了近100个已实施和提议的支付改革项目,将这些项目中的每一个归类为11种支付改革模式之一,并确定了与每种模式相关的绩效评估需求。结果的综合分析提出了绩效评估发展的近期优先事项,并确定了与将绩效评估用作支付改革基础相关的重大挑战。该报告还旨在创建一个用于分析未来绩效评估机会的共享框架。本报告面向众多在医疗保健改革立法之后负责勾勒国家质量战略的利益相关者。

相似文献

1
Payment Reform: Analysis of Models and Performance Measurement Implications.支付改革:模式分析及绩效评估影响
Rand Health Q. 2011 Mar 1;1(1):3. eCollection 2011 Spring.
2
Effects of Health Care Payment Models on Physician Practice in the United States: Follow-Up Study.美国医疗支付模式对医生执业的影响:随访研究
Rand Health Q. 2020 Jun 15;9(1):1. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
Medicare program; hospital inpatient prospective payment systems for acute care hospitals and the long-term care hospital prospective payment system and fiscal year 2015 rates; quality reporting requirements for specific providers; reasonable compensation equivalents for physician services in excluded hospitals and certain teaching hospitals; provider administrative appeals and judicial review; enforcement provisions for organ transplant centers; and electronic health record (EHR) incentive program. Final rule.医疗保险计划;急性护理医院的住院病人前瞻性支付系统、长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统及2015财年费率;特定提供者的质量报告要求;被排除医院及某些教学医院中医师服务的合理补偿等价物;提供者行政申诉和司法审查;器官移植中心的执行规定;以及电子健康记录(EHR)激励计划。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2014 Aug 22;79(163):49853-50536.
4
Episode-Based Payment and Direct Employer Purchasing of Healthcare Services: Recent Bundled Payment Innovations and the Geisinger Health System Experience.基于 episode 的医疗服务付费与雇主直接购买:近期捆绑式付费创新及盖辛格医疗系统的经验
Neurosurgery. 2017 Apr 1;80(4S):S50-S58. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx004.
5
States Encouraging Value-Based Payment: Lessons From CMS's State Innovation Models Initiative.鼓励基于价值的支付的州:CMS 的州创新模式倡议的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):506-542. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12380. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
6
Barriers to payment reform: Experiences from nine Dutch population health management sites.支付方式改革的障碍:来自九个荷兰人口健康管理点的经验。
Health Policy. 2019 Nov;123(11):1100-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
7
Physician payment outlook for 2012: déjà vu.2012 年医生薪酬展望:似曾相识。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):E27-52.
8
Payment Reform: Unprecedented and Evolving Impact on Gynecologic Oncology.支付改革:对妇科肿瘤学产生的前所未有的且不断演变的影响
Front Oncol. 2016 Apr 15;6:84. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00084. eCollection 2016.
9
AMCP Guide to Pharmaceutical Payment Methods.《AMCP药品支付方式指南》
J Manag Care Pharm. 2007 Oct;13(8 Suppl C):S1-39.
10
Medicaid Payment and Delivery System Reform: Early Insights from 10 Medicaid Expansion States.医疗补助计划支付与服务提供系统改革:来自10个医疗补助计划扩展州的早期见解。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Oct 1;2017:1-15.

引用本文的文献

1
The need for a regulatory rethink: a perspective from Australia.监管反思的必要性:来自澳大利亚的视角
Future Hosp J. 2014 Oct;1(2):117-121. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.14.028.
2
Integrated and Person-Centered Care for Community-Living Older Adults: A Cost-Effectiveness Study.社区居住的老年综合和以人为中心的护理:一项成本效益研究。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct;53(5):3471-3494. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12853. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
3
Impact of oncologist payment method on health care outcomes, costs, quality: a rapid review.肿瘤学家支付方式对医疗保健结果、成本和质量的影响:快速综述
Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 21;5(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0341-2.
4
Downstream tests, treatments, and annual direct payments in older men cared for by primary care providers with high or low prostate-specific antigen screening rates using 100 percent Texas U.S. Medicare public insurance claims data: a retrospective cohort study.使用100%的美国德克萨斯州医疗保险公共保险索赔数据,对前列腺特异性抗原筛查率高或低的初级保健提供者所护理的老年男性进行下游检测、治疗和年度直接支付情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 15;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1265-1.
5
Understanding and measuring health care insecurity.理解和衡量医疗保健不安全状况。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2014 Nov;25(4):1821-32. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0180.
6
Systematic health management: the time has come to do the right thing for each person.系统化健康管理:为每个人做正确之事的时候到了。
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2011 May;4(3):152-4.
7
Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: The Critical Role of Quality Measurement.提供高质量癌症护理:质量测量的关键作用。
Healthc (Amst). 2014 Mar 1;2(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.11.003.
8
Measuring Care Continuity: A Comparison of Claims-based Methods.衡量护理连续性:基于索赔方法的比较。
Med Care. 2016 May;54(5):e30-4. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000018.
9
Governing healthcare through performance measurement in Massachusetts and the Netherlands.通过绩效评估对马萨诸塞州和荷兰的医疗保健进行管理。
Health Policy. 2014 May;116(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis & commentary. The foundation that health reform lays for improved payment, care coordination, and prevention.分析与评论。医改为改善支付、医疗协调和预防奠定的基础。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1183-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0415.
2
ACCF/AHA 2010 Position Statement on Composite Measures for Healthcare Performance Assessment: a report of American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop a Position Statement on Composite Measures).美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会医疗保健绩效评估综合指标2010年立场声明:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会绩效指标特别工作组(制定综合指标立场声明的写作委员会)报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 20;55(16):1755-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.016.
3
Payment reform--the need to harmonize approaches in Medicare and the private sector.支付改革——协调医疗保险和私营部门方法的必要性。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 7;362(1):3-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0910459. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
4
From volume to value: better ways to pay for health care.从量到值:更好的医疗保健支付方式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):1418-28. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1418.
5
A systematic review of health care efficiency measures.医疗保健效率衡量指标的系统综述。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun;44(3):784-805. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00942.x. Epub 2009 Jan 28.
6
Payment reform options: episode payment is a good place to start.付费方式改革方案:按病种付费是一个很好的起点。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):w262-71. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w262. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
7
Fostering accountable health care: moving forward in medicare.促进负责任的医疗保健:在医疗保险中前进。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):w219-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w219. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
8
Beyond pay for performance--emerging models of provider-payment reform.超越按绩效付费——医疗服务提供者支付改革的新兴模式
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 18;359(12):1197-200. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0804658.
9
The wisdom and justice of not paying for "preventable complications".不为“可预防的并发症”付费的合理性与公正性。
JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2197-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2197.