• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing the Quality and Value of Psychological Health Care in Civilian Health Plans: Lessons and Implications for the Military Health System.评估民用健康计划中心理健康护理的质量和价值:对军事健康系统的经验教训及启示
Rand Health Q. 2016 May 9;5(4):16.
2
Measuring the Quality of Care for Psychological Health Conditions in the Military Health System: Candidate Quality Measures for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder.衡量军事卫生系统中心理健康状况的医疗质量:创伤后应激障碍和重度抑郁症的候选质量指标
Rand Health Q. 2015 Nov 30;5(2):16.
3
Quality of Care for PTSD and Depression in the Military Health System: Phase I Report.军事卫生系统中创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症的护理质量:第一阶段报告。
Rand Health Q. 2016 Jun 20;6(1):14.
4
Quality of Care for PTSD and Depression in the Military Health System: Final Report.军事卫生系统中创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症的护理质量:最终报告。
Rand Health Q. 2018 Apr 1;7(3):4. eCollection 2018 Apr.
5
Delivering Clinical Practice Guideline-Concordant Care for PTSD and Major Depression in Military Treatment Facilities.在军事治疗机构中提供符合临床实践指南的创伤后应激障碍和重度抑郁症护理。
Rand Health Q. 2018 Apr 1;7(3):3. eCollection 2018 Apr.
6
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
7
Assessing the Quality of Outpatient Pain Care and Opioid Prescribing in the Military Health System.评估军事卫生系统中门诊疼痛护理和阿片类药物处方的质量。
Rand Health Q. 2022 Aug 31;9(4):19. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
In defense of Direct Care: Limiting access to military hospitals could worsen quality and safety.为直接护理辩护:限制进入军队医院可能会降低质量和安全性。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug;57(4):723-733. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13885. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
9
Graduate Medical Education in the Military Health System: Strategic Analysis and Options.《军卫生体系下的研究生医学教育:战略分析与选择》。
Mil Med. 2023 Mar 6;188(Suppl 1):1-7. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac325.
10
Development of clinical recommendations for progressive return to activity after military mild traumatic brain injury: guidance for rehabilitation providers.军事性轻度创伤性脑损伤后逐步恢复活动的临床建议制定:康复提供者指南
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2015 Jan-Feb;30(1):56-67. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000104.

引用本文的文献

1
Delivering Clinical Practice Guideline-Concordant Care for PTSD and Major Depression in Military Treatment Facilities.在军事治疗机构中提供符合临床实践指南的创伤后应激障碍和重度抑郁症护理。
Rand Health Q. 2018 Apr 1;7(3):3. eCollection 2018 Apr.
2
Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective.衡量与改善精神卫生保健质量:全球视角
World Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;17(1):30-38. doi: 10.1002/wps.20482.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the Quality of Care for Psychological Health Conditions in the Military Health System: Candidate Quality Measures for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder.衡量军事卫生系统中心理健康状况的医疗质量:创伤后应激障碍和重度抑郁症的候选质量指标
Rand Health Q. 2015 Nov 30;5(2):16.
2
Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions.衡量医疗保健价值导向型采购计划的成效:环境扫描、文献综述及专家小组讨论的结果
Rand Health Q. 2014 Dec 30;4(3):9.
3
EPA guidance on the quality of mental health services.环境保护署关于心理健康服务质量的指南。
Eur Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;27(2):87-113. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
4
What is value in health care?医疗保健中的价值是什么?
N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 23;363(26):2477-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011024. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
5
Use of outcomes information in child mental health treatment: results from a pilot study.儿童心理健康治疗中结局信息的使用:一项试点研究的结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Dec;61(12):1211-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.2010.61.12.1211.
6
Challenges and opportunities in measuring the quality of mental health care.衡量精神卫生保健质量的挑战与机遇。
Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;55(9):549-57. doi: 10.1177/070674371005500903.
7
Performance measurement for co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders.共病精神健康和物质使用障碍的绩效测量。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2009 Oct 14;4:18. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-4-18.
8
Performance measurement in mental health care: present situation and future possibilities.心理健康护理中的绩效评估:现状与未来可能。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2010 Jul-Sep;25(3):198-214. doi: 10.1002/hpm.951.
9
Pay for performance in behavioral health.行为健康领域的绩效薪酬。
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Dec;59(12):1419-29. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.12.1419.
10
Systematic use of patient-rated depression severity monitoring: is it helpful and feasible in clinical psychiatry?系统使用患者自评抑郁严重程度监测:在临床精神病学中是否有用且可行?
Psychiatr Serv. 2008 Oct;59(10):1148-54. doi: 10.1176/ps.2008.59.10.1148.

评估民用健康计划中心理健康护理的质量和价值:对军事健康系统的经验教训及启示

Assessing the Quality and Value of Psychological Health Care in Civilian Health Plans: Lessons and Implications for the Military Health System.

作者信息

Martsolf Grant R, Osilla Karen Chan, Mandel Daniel, Hepner Kimberly A, Farmer Carrie M

出版信息

Rand Health Q. 2016 May 9;5(4):16.

PMID:28083426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5158231/
Abstract

The Military Health System (MHS) strives to provide high-quality care and improve outcomes for individuals with psychological health conditions. Over the last decade, the MHS has provided care to a growing number of individuals with psychological health conditions, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). However, little is known about the extent to which the MHS delivers care that is consistent with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines or if it is achieving positive outcomes for its service members. To better understand these issues, the Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury (DCoE) asked the RAND Corporation to describe civilian health plansâ; approaches to systematically measuring the quality of psychological health care delivered by providers in their networks. This work was part of a larger effort by RAND to develop a framework and identify a set of measures for monitoring the quality of care provided by the MHS for psychological health conditions.

摘要

军事卫生系统(MHS)致力于为患有心理健康问题的个人提供高质量护理并改善治疗效果。在过去十年中,MHS为越来越多患有心理健康问题的个人提供护理,如创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和重度抑郁症(MDD)。然而,对于MHS提供符合循证临床实践指南的护理程度,或者它是否为其服务人员取得积极治疗效果,人们知之甚少。为了更好地理解这些问题,国防心理健康与创伤性脑损伤卓越中心(DCoE)要求兰德公司描述民用健康计划在系统测量其网络中提供者提供的心理健康护理质量方面的方法。这项工作是兰德公司为制定一个框架并确定一套用于监测MHS为心理健康状况提供的护理质量的指标而做出的更大努力的一部分。