Stieger Stefan, Kandler Christian, Tran Ulrich S, Pietschnig Jakob, Voracek Martin
Research Methods, Assessment, and iScience, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Universitätsstraße 10, 78464, Constance, Germany.
Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, School of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Behav Genet. 2017 Mar;47(2):175-192. doi: 10.1007/s10519-016-9829-8. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
In today's world, researchers frequently utilize indirect measures of implicit (i.e., automatic, spontaneous) evaluations. The results of several studies have supported the usefulness of these measures in predicting behavior, as compared to utilizing direct measures of explicit (i.e., purposeful, deliberate) evaluations. A current, under-debate issue concerns the origin of these implicit evaluations. The present genetically sensitive multi-group study analyzed data from 223 twin pairs and 222 biological core families to estimate possible genetic and environmental sources of individual differences in implicit and explicit self-esteem and affect. The results show that implicit self-esteem and affect maintain a substantial genetic basis, but demonstrate little influence from the shared environment by siblings (e.g., shared familial socialization in childhood). A bivariate analysis found that implicit and explicit evaluations of the same construct share a common genetic core which aligns with the motivation and opportunity as determinants (MODE) model.
在当今世界,研究人员经常使用间接测量方法来评估内隐(即自动、自发)评价。与使用直接测量外显(即有目的、刻意)评价的方法相比,多项研究结果支持了这些测量方法在预测行为方面的有效性。当前一个正在讨论的问题涉及这些内隐评价的起源。本项具有基因敏感性的多组研究分析了来自223对双胞胎和222个生物学核心家庭的数据,以估计内隐和外显自尊及情感方面个体差异可能的遗传和环境来源。结果表明,内隐自尊和情感有很大的遗传基础,但受兄弟姐妹共享环境(如童年时期共享的家庭社会化)的影响很小。双变量分析发现,对同一构念的内隐和外显评价共享一个共同的遗传核心,这与作为决定因素的动机和机会(MODE)模型相符。