Ridley Charles R, Jeffrey Christina E, Roberson Richard B
Texas A&M University.
J Clin Psychol. 2017 Apr;73(4):359-375. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22354. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
Case conceptualization, an integral component of mental health treatment, aims to facilitate therapeutic gains by formulating a clear picture of a client's psychological presentation. However, despite numerous attempts to improve this clinical activity, it remains unclear how well existing methods achieve their purported purpose. Case formulation is inconsistently defined in the literature and implemented in practice, with many methods varying in complexity, theoretical grounding, and empirical support. In addition, many of the methods demand a precise clinical acumen that is easily influenced by judgmental and inferential errors. These errors occur regardless of clinicians' level of training or amount of clinical experience. Overall, the lack of a consensus definition, a diversity of methods, and susceptibility of clinicians to errors are manifestations of the state of crisis in case conceptualization. This article, the 2nd in a series of 5 on thematic mapping, argues the need for more reliable and valid models of case conceptualization.
病例概念化是心理健康治疗的一个重要组成部分,旨在通过清晰勾勒来访者的心理表现来促进治疗进展。然而,尽管人们多次尝试改进这一临床活动,但现有方法在多大程度上实现其宣称的目的仍不明确。病例制定在文献中的定义不一致,在实践中的实施也不一致,许多方法在复杂性、理论基础和实证支持方面各不相同。此外,许多方法需要精确的临床敏锐度,而这很容易受到判断和推理错误的影响。无论临床医生的培训水平或临床经验如何,这些错误都会发生。总体而言,缺乏共识定义、方法多样以及临床医生易犯错误是病例概念化危机状态的表现。本文是关于主题映射的系列文章中的第二篇,主张需要更可靠、有效的病例概念化模型。