Ridley Charles R, Jeffrey Christina E, Roberson Richard B
Texas A&M University.
J Clin Psychol. 2017 Apr;73(4):393-409. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22351. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
This article, the 4th in a series of 5, introduces the 3-stage process of thematic mapping: theme identification, theme interpretation, and theme intervention. Theme identification is based on inductive reasoning, in which clinicians seek to discover and describe behavioral patterns in emotionally charged episodes. Theme interpretation subsequently initiates a process of deductive reasoning, wherein clinicians distill the generalized pattern into dominant and subthemes. Each theme is then labeled with a compelling metaphor that is representative of the theme interpretation. In the 3rd stage, theme intervention, clinicians seek to change the dysfunctional dominant and subthemes through collaboration with the clients. The process unfolds within 5 overarching parameters: a focus on comprehensiveness, simplification, maximal objectivity/impartial subjectivity, observation and inference, and an idiographic approach. Alternative models of case formulation are offered in comparison to thematic mapping.
本文是系列文章5篇中的第4篇,介绍了主题映射的三阶段过程:主题识别、主题阐释和主题干预。主题识别基于归纳推理,临床医生据此在情绪激动的事件中寻找并描述行为模式。主题阐释随后启动演绎推理过程,临床医生将归纳出的一般模式提炼为主要主题和次要主题。然后,每个主题都被赋予一个能代表主题阐释的引人注目的隐喻。在第三阶段,即主题干预阶段,临床医生试图通过与来访者合作来改变功能失调的主要主题和次要主题。该过程在五个总体参数范围内展开:注重全面性、简化、最大程度的客观性/公正的主观性、观察与推理以及个性化方法。与主题映射相比,还提供了案例形成的替代模型。