• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国的非正式照料与政策漂移政治

Informal Caregiving and the Politics of Policy Drift in the United States.

作者信息

Rocco Philip

机构信息

a Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science , Marquette University , Milwaukee , Wisconsin , USA.

出版信息

J Aging Soc Policy. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(5):413-432. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2017.1280748. Epub 2017 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1080/08959420.2017.1280748
PMID:28085644
Abstract

Informal caregivers play an increasingly important role in caring for aging Americans. Yet existing social policies that could support informal caregiving have experienced "policy drift," a failure to adapt to social risks that develop after policies are initially enacted. This article examines policy makers' success at updating seven major policies to address caregiver needs. It draws on an original data set of legislation in this area introduced between 1991 and 2006 (n = 96). Findings indicate that drift is more likely when policy updates are costly, lack support from members of majority parties in the House and Senate, and fail to generate bipartisan support.

摘要

非正式照料者在照顾美国老年人方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。然而,本可支持非正式照料的现有社会政策却出现了“政策漂移”,即在政策最初颁布后未能适应新出现的社会风险。本文考察了政策制定者在更新七项主要政策以满足照料者需求方面的成效。研究使用了1991年至2006年间该领域提出的96项立法的原始数据集。研究结果表明,当政策更新成本高昂、得不到众议院和参议院多数党成员的支持且无法获得两党支持时,政策漂移的可能性更大。

相似文献

1
Informal Caregiving and the Politics of Policy Drift in the United States.美国的非正式照料与政策漂移政治
J Aging Soc Policy. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(5):413-432. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2017.1280748. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
2
Can a complex adaptive systems perspective support the resiliency of the heart failure patient - informal caregiver dyad?从复杂适应系统的角度来看,能否支持心力衰竭患者-非专业照护者对的适应能力?
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2019 Mar;13(1):9-13. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000406.
3
Policy and advocacy for informal caregivers: How state policy influenced a community initiative.为非正式照护者制定政策和进行宣传:州政策如何影响社区倡议。
J Public Health Policy. 2017 Nov;38(4):503-508. doi: 10.1057/s41271-017-0084-x.
4
Modeling costs and burden of informal caregiving for persons with bipolar disorder.双相情感障碍患者非正式照料的成本与负担建模
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2006 Jun;9(2):99-110.
5
Caregiving for the Elderly Person: Discourses Embedded in the Brazilian Practical Guide for the Caregiver.老年人照料:巴西照料者实用指南中的话语
J Aging Soc Policy. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(5):444-460. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2017.1342526. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
6
Does support from foreign domestic workers decrease the negative impact of informal caregiving? Results from Singapore survey on informal caregiving.外籍家庭佣工的支持是否能减轻非正式护理的负面影响?来自新加坡非正式护理调查的结果。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Jul;68(4):609-21. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt042. Epub 2013 May 30.
7
The State of Family Caregiving Policy.家庭护理政策状况
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Jul 3;36(4):479-489. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2024.2339177. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
8
Caring for Individuals with Chronic Illness and Minor Depression: Latino Perceptions of Caregiver Burden.关爱慢性病患者及轻度抑郁症患者:拉丁裔对照顾者负担的认知
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2017 Jan;60(1):79-95. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2016.1268230. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
9
Cost of informal caregiving associated with stroke among the elderly in the United States.美国老年人中风相关的非正式护理成本。
Neurology. 2014 Nov 11;83(20):1831-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000986. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
10
Paid family caregiving: a review of progress and policies.有偿家庭护理:进展与政策综述
J Aging Soc Policy. 1993;5(1-2):73-89. doi: 10.1300/J031v05n01_06.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging Existing Datasets to Advance Family Caregiving Research: Opportunities to Measure What Matters.利用现有数据集推进家庭护理研究:衡量重要事项的机会。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2024 Jul 3;36(4):562-580. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2024.2320043. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
Educational Attainment Differences in Attitudes toward Provisions of IADL Care for Older Adults in the U.S.美国老年人对日常生活活动能力(IADL)护理服务态度上的教育程度差异
J Aging Soc Policy. 2022 Nov 2;34(6):903-922. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1722898. Epub 2020 Feb 1.