• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人肾盂切开取石术的手术结果及围手术期并发症

Outcomes and peri-operative complications of robotic pyelolithotomy.

作者信息

Schulster Michael L, Sidhom Daniel A, Sturgeon Kathryn, Borin James F, Bjurlin Marc A

机构信息

Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, 550 First Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Department of Urology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive 2nd Floor, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2020 Jun;14(3):401-407. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01004-2. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-019-01004-2
PMID:31317314
Abstract

Standard of care for large or complex renal stones is percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Robotic pyelolithotomy, however, may be a feasible alternative, but limited data exist on its outcomes and complications. Our study objective was to describe the outcomes and peri-operative complications of robotic pyelolithotomy for complex renal calculi. We performed a retrospective analysis of robotic pyelolithotomy at our tertiary academic institution from 2015 to 2018. Demographics, stone clearance rates, complications, estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of stay were reported. 15 patients were included with a median age of 59 years (SD 15.3, 27-80) and BMI 25 kg/m (SD 4.6, 20.9-35.7). Median follow-up was 4 months. Median stone size was 3 cm (SD 1.2 cm, 2-5 cm). Concomitant pyeloplasty was performed in 2 patients, complete stone clearance in 11 (73%) cases and 4 out of 5 (80%) with a solitary stone. Median operative time was 191.5 min (SD 64.8 min, 110-303 min), with no open conversion. Median EBL was 70 ml (SD 65 ml, 20-250 ml) and median length of stay was 1 day (SD 1 day, 1-5 days). Median change in creatinine and eGFR were - 0.02 mg/dl and + 3 ml/min/1.73 m. There were no cases of sepsis or post-operative fever and only one case of transfusion. Robotic pyelolithotomy appears safe and effective. Ultimately, less bleeding, lower septicemia, renal parenchymal preservation, and favorable stone-free rates in a single procedure make this as an attractive option in the management of select patients with large renal stone disease.

摘要

对于大的或复杂的肾结石,标准治疗方法是经皮肾镜取石术。然而,机器人肾盂切开取石术可能是一种可行的替代方法,但关于其疗效和并发症的数据有限。我们的研究目的是描述机器人肾盂切开取石术治疗复杂肾结石的疗效和围手术期并发症。我们对2015年至2018年在我们的三级学术机构进行的机器人肾盂切开取石术进行了回顾性分析。报告了人口统计学、结石清除率、并发症、估计失血量、手术时间和住院时间。纳入了15例患者,中位年龄为59岁(标准差15.3,27 - 80岁),体重指数为25kg/m(标准差4.6,20.9 - 35.7)。中位随访时间为4个月。中位结石大小为3cm(标准差1.2cm,2 - 5cm)。2例患者同时进行了肾盂成形术,11例(73%)患者结石完全清除,5例单发结石患者中有4例(80%)结石完全清除。中位手术时间为191.5分钟(标准差64.8分钟,110 - 303分钟),无开放手术转换。中位估计失血量为70ml(标准差65ml,20 - 250ml),中位住院时间为1天(标准差1天,1 - 5天)。肌酐和估算肾小球滤过率的中位变化分别为 - 0.02mg/dl和 + 3ml/min/1.73m²。没有脓毒症或术后发热病例,仅有1例输血病例。机器人肾盂切开取石术似乎是安全有效的。最终,单次手术中出血少、败血症发生率低、肾实质得以保留且结石清除率良好,使其成为治疗部分大型肾结石疾病患者的有吸引力的选择。

相似文献

1
Outcomes and peri-operative complications of robotic pyelolithotomy.机器人肾盂切开取石术的手术结果及围手术期并发症
J Robot Surg. 2020 Jun;14(3):401-407. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01004-2. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
2
Robotic management of large stone disease: a case series.大型结石病的机器人管理:病例系列
J Robot Surg. 2020 Dec;14(6):855-859. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01060-z. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
3
Zero-fragment Nephrolithotomy: A Multi-center Evaluation of Robotic Pyelolithotomy and Nephrolithotomy for Treating Renal Stones.零碎片肾切开取石术:机器人肾盂切开取石术和肾切开取石术治疗肾结石的多中心评估。
Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):1014-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
4
Endoscopic-assisted robotic pyelolithotomy: a viable treatment option for complex pediatric nephrolithiasis.内镜辅助机器人肾盂切开取石术:复杂小儿肾结石的一种可行治疗选择。
J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Apr;16(2):192.e1-192.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.12.007. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
5
Robotic pyelolithotomy for treating large renal stone disease: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.机器人肾盂切开取石术治疗大肾结石病:系统评价和单臂荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 9;18(1):316. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02064-9.
6
Robot-assisted pyeloplasty and pyelolithotomy in patients with ureteropelvic junction stenosis.机器人辅助下肾盂成形术和肾盂切开取石术治疗输尿管肾盂连接部狭窄患者。
Scand J Urol. 2017 Aug;51(4):323-328. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1300188. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
7
Robotic Pyelolithotomy, Extended Pyelolithotomy, Nephrolithotomy, and Anatrophic Nephrolithotomy.机器人肾盂切开取石术、扩展肾盂切开取石术、经皮肾镜取石术和腔镜下肾盂输尿管切开取石术。
J Endourol. 2018 May;32(S1):S73-S81. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0718.
8
Robotic Pyelolithotomy for the Intact Removal of a Complete Staghorn Calculus: A Feasible Approach Even After a Previous Open Pyelolithotomy.机器人肾盂切开取石术完整取出完全鹿角形结石:即使既往有开放性肾盂切开取石术,这也是一种可行的方法。
Urology. 2019 May;127:133. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
9
Robotic nephrolithotomy and pyelolithotomy with utilization of the robotic ultrasound probe.机器人辅助肾及肾盂切开取石术并联合应用机器人超声探头。
Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):125-6; discussion 126. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.19.
10
Mini-invasive robotic assisted pyelolithotomy: Comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach.微创机器人辅助肾盂切开取石术:经腹腔与经腹膜后途径的比较。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2019 Jul 2;91(2). doi: 10.4081/aiua.2019.2.107.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted Pyelolithotomy and Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Stones Larger Than 2 cm in Older Adults: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.老年患者中大于2厘米肾结石的机器人辅助肾盂切开取石术与微创经皮肾镜取石术手术结果的比较分析:一项为期一年的随访研究
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2025 Jun 17;18:177-185. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S532866. eCollection 2025.
2
Robot-Assisted Pyelolithotomy in Pelvic Kidney.盆腔肾的机器人辅助肾盂切开取石术
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 18;13(24):7727. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247727.
3
Robotic pyelolithotomy for treating large renal stone disease: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.
机器人肾盂切开取石术治疗大肾结石病:系统评价和单臂荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Aug 9;18(1):316. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02064-9.
4
The experience of a tertiary referral center with laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for large renal stones during 18 years.18 年来三级转诊中心腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术治疗大肾结石的经验。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):23102. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50331-w.
5
Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy Lithotripter for Use in Robotic Pyelolithotomy.瑞士 LithoClast® Trilogy 碎石系统在机器人肾盂切开取石术中的应用。
CRSLS. 2023 Sep 4;10(3). doi: 10.4293/CRSLS.2023.00027. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
6
Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy and Da Vinci Robotic Surgery in Community Patients with Renal Pelvic Stones Larger than 2 cm.社区 2cm 以上肾盂结石患者行软性输尿管镜与达芬奇机器人手术的疗效比较分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 29;59(8):1395. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081395.
7
Surgery for Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis: A Comparison of Midline Transperitoneal and Flank Retroperitoneal Laparotomy Approaches to Nephrectomy.黄色肉芽肿性肾盂肾炎的手术治疗:经腹中线与侧腹腹膜后剖腹肾切除术入路的比较
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 31;11(15):4476. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154476.
8
Impact of Cluster Nursing on Nursing on VAS Score and Urinary Function of Patients after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Pneumatic Lithotripsy (PCNL).集束护理对经皮肾镜气压弹道碎石术(PCNL)患者视觉模拟评分(VAS)及泌尿功能的影响
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Mar 19;2022:3743640. doi: 10.1155/2022/3743640. eCollection 2022.