Cummings James J, Lakshminrusimha Satyan
aDepartment of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital at Albany Medical Center, Albany bDepartment of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, New York, USA.
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017 Apr;29(2):153-158. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000458.
A collaboration of comparative effectiveness research trials of pulse oximeter saturation (SpO2) targeting in extremely low-gestational-age neonates have begun to report their aggregate results. We examine the results of those trials, collectively referred to as the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis or NeOProM. We also discuss the uncertainties that remain and the clinical challenges that lie ahead.
The primary outcome from NeOProM was a composite of death or disability at 18-24 months corrected age. In 2016 the last of these reports was published. Although there were no differences in the primary outcome overall, analyses of secondary outcomes and data subsets following a pulse oximeter revision show significant treatment differences between targeting a lower compared with a higher SpO2.
NeOProM represents the largest collaborative clinical research study of SpO2 targets in extremely low-gestational-age neonates. Although aggregate results give us some insight into the feasibility and efficacy of SpO2 targeting in this population, many questions remain. A patient-level analysis, tracking individual outcomes based on actual SpO2 experienced, may shed some light on these questions. However, finding a single optimal SpO2 range seems unlikely.
针对极低孕周新生儿进行脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)目标设定的比较效果研究合作试验已开始报告其汇总结果。我们审视这些试验的结果,这些试验统称为新生儿氧合前瞻性荟萃分析(NeOProM)。我们还讨论了仍然存在的不确定性以及未来的临床挑战。
NeOProM的主要结局是矫正年龄18至24个月时的死亡或残疾综合情况。2016年发布了这些报告中的最后一份。尽管总体主要结局没有差异,但在脉搏血氧仪修订后对次要结局和数据子集的分析显示,较低SpO2目标与较高SpO2目标相比存在显著的治疗差异。
NeOProM是针对极低孕周新生儿SpO2目标的最大规模合作临床研究。尽管汇总结果让我们对该人群中SpO2目标设定的可行性和有效性有了一些了解,但仍有许多问题。基于实际经历的SpO2追踪个体结局的患者层面分析可能会为这些问题提供一些线索。然而,找到单一的最佳SpO2范围似乎不太可能。