• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中氧饱和度报警阈值和目标范围:基于可能的氧分压和成熟度的观察评估。

Thresholds for oximetry alarms and target range in the NICU: an observational assessment based on likely oxygen tension and maturity.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic.

, Lake Arrowhead, USA.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jun 27;20(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02225-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12887-020-02225-3
PMID:32593300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7320542/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Continuous monitoring of SpO in the neonatal ICU is the standard of care. Changes in SpO exposure have been shown to markedly impact outcome, but limiting extreme episodes is an arduous task. Much more complicated than setting alarm policy, it is fraught with balancing alarm fatigue and compliance. Information on optimum strategies is limited.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study intended to describe the relative chance of normoxemia, and risks of hypoxemia and hyperoxemia at relevant SpO levels in the neonatal ICU. The data, paired SpO-PaO and post-menstrual age, are from a single tertiary care unit. They reflect all infants receiving supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation during a 3-year period. The primary measures were the chance of normoxemia (PaO 50-80 mmHg), risks of severe hypoxemia (PaO ≤ 40 mmHg), and of severe hyperoxemia (PaO ≥ 100 mmHg) at relevant SpO levels.

RESULTS

Neonates were categorized by postmenstrual age: < 33 (n = 155), 33-36 (n = 192) and > 36 (n = 1031) weeks. From these infants, 26,162 SpO-PaO pairs were evaluated. The post-menstrual weeks (median and IQR) of the three groups were: 26 (24-28) n = 2603; 34 (33-35) n = 2501; and 38 (37-39) n = 21,058. The chance of normoxemia (65, 95%-CI 64-67%) was similar across the SpO range of 88-95%, and independent of PMA. The increasing risk of severe hypoxemia became marked at a SpO of 85% (25, 95%-CI 21-29%), and was independent of PMA. The risk of severe hyperoxemia was dependent on PMA. For infants < 33 weeks it was marked at 98% SpO (25, 95%-CI 18-33%), for infants 33-36 weeks at 97% SpO (24, 95%-CI 14-25%) and for those > 36 weeks at 96% SpO (20, 95%-CI 17-22%).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of hyperoxemia and hypoxemia increases exponentially as SpO moves towards extremes. Postmenstrual age influences the threshold at which the risk of hyperoxemia became pronounced, but not the thresholds of hypoxemia or normoxemia. The thresholds at which a marked change in the risk of hyperoxemia and hypoxemia occur can be used to guide the setting of alarm thresholds. Optimal management of neonatal oxygen saturation must take into account concerns of alarm fatigue, staffing levels, and FiO titration practices.

摘要

背景

新生儿 ICU 中持续监测 SpO 是标准的护理方法。SpO 暴露的变化已被证明对结果有显著影响,但限制极端情况是一项艰巨的任务。这比设置警报策略要复杂得多,充满了平衡警报疲劳和合规性的挑战。有关最佳策略的信息有限。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究,旨在描述新生儿 ICU 中相关 SpO 水平下的氧合正常、低氧血症和高氧血症的相对机会,以及相关风险。数据是配对的 SpO-PaO 和胎龄,来自于一个单一的三级护理单位。它们反映了所有在 3 年期间接受补充氧气和机械通气的婴儿。主要测量指标是在相关 SpO 水平下氧合正常(PaO 50-80mmHg)、严重低氧血症(PaO≤40mmHg)和严重高氧血症(PaO≥100mmHg)的机会。

结果

根据胎龄将新生儿分为:<33 周(n=155)、33-36 周(n=192)和>36 周(n=1031)周。从这些婴儿中评估了 26162 对 SpO-PaO。三组的胎龄(中位数和 IQR)分别为:26 周(24-28)n=2603;34 周(33-35)n=2501;和 38 周(37-39)n=21058。在 88-95%的 SpO 范围内,氧合正常(65%,95%-CI 64-67%)的机会相似,且与胎龄无关。严重低氧血症的风险在 SpO 为 85%时显著增加(25%,95%-CI 21-29%),且与胎龄无关。严重高氧血症的风险取决于胎龄。对于<33 周的婴儿,风险在 SpO 为 98%时明显增加(25%,95%-CI 18-33%),对于 33-36 周的婴儿在 SpO 为 97%时明显增加(24%,95%-CI 14-25%),对于>36 周的婴儿在 SpO 为 96%时明显增加(20%,95%-CI 17-22%)。

结论

随着 SpO 向极端值移动,高氧血症和低氧血症的风险呈指数级增加。胎龄影响高氧血症风险显著增加的阈值,但不影响低氧血症或氧合正常的阈值。高氧血症和低氧血症风险显著变化的阈值可用于指导警报阈值的设置。新生儿氧饱和度的最佳管理必须考虑到警报疲劳、人员配备水平和 FiO 滴定实践的担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5c2/7320542/41342ad16b6d/12887_2020_2225_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5c2/7320542/41342ad16b6d/12887_2020_2225_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5c2/7320542/41342ad16b6d/12887_2020_2225_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Thresholds for oximetry alarms and target range in the NICU: an observational assessment based on likely oxygen tension and maturity.新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)中氧饱和度报警阈值和目标范围:基于可能的氧分压和成熟度的观察评估。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jun 27;20(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02225-3.
2
Hypoxemic and hyperoxemic likelihood in pulse oximetry ranges: NICU observational study.脉搏血氧饱和度范围内低氧血症和高氧血症的可能性:NICU 观察性研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 May;104(3):F274-F279. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314448. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
3
Evaluation of two SpO alarm strategies during automated FiO control in the NICU: a randomized crossover study.评价两种 SpO2 报警策略在新生儿重症监护病房自动 FiO2 控制中的作用:一项随机交叉研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 May 6;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1496-5.
4
Frequency and duration of extreme hypoxemic and hyperoxemic episodes during manual and automatic oxygen control in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort analysis from randomized studies.早产儿手动和自动氧控时严重低氧血症和高氧血症发作的频率和持续时间:来自随机研究的回顾性队列分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03407-x.
5
Alarms, oxygen saturations, and SpO2 averaging time in the NICU.新生儿重症监护病房中的警报、血氧饱和度及脉搏血氧饱和度平均时间。
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2016;9(4):357-362. doi: 10.3233/NPM-16162.
6
Optimal Target Range of Closed-Loop Inspired Oxygen Support in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Cross-Over Study.闭环触发氧支持在早产儿中的最佳目标范围:一项随机交叉研究。
J Pediatr. 2018 Jun;197:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.077. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
Determining a target SpO2 to maintain PaO2 within a physiological range.确定目标 SpO2 以维持 PaO2 在生理范围内。
PLoS One. 2021 May 13;16(5):e0250740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250740. eCollection 2021.
8
Early warning for SpO decrease by the oxygen reserve index in neonates and small infants.通过氧储备指数对新生儿和小婴儿的 SpO 下降进行早期预警。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Nov;33(11):923-929. doi: 10.1111/pan.14743. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
9
Effects of closed-loop automatic control of the inspiratory fraction of oxygen (FiO-C) on outcome of extremely preterm infants - study protocol of a randomized controlled parallel group multicenter trial for safety and efficacy.闭环式吸入氧分数自动控制(FiO-C)对极早产儿结局的影响 - 一项安全性和有效性的随机对照平行分组多中心试验研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1735-9.
10
Hypoxemia Episodes during Day and Night and Their Impact on Oxygen Saturation Targeting in Mechanically Ventilated Preterm Infants.昼夜低氧血症发作及其对机械通气早产儿氧饱和度目标的影响。
Neonatology. 2018;113(1):69-74. doi: 10.1159/000481395. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Oxygenation Practices During General Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients: An International Survey in Europe, USA, Australia, and New Zealand.小儿患者全身麻醉期间的氧合实践:欧洲、美国、澳大利亚和新西兰的一项国际调查
Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Aug;35(8):643-648. doi: 10.1111/pan.15139. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
2
Performance and safety of the PRICO closed-loop oxygen saturation targeting system in neonates: pragmatic multicentre cross-over study (TarOx Study).PRICO闭环氧饱和度目标系统在新生儿中的性能与安全性:实用多中心交叉研究(TarOx研究)
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Jul 16;8(1):e002583. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002583.
3
Determining an Optimal Oxygen Saturation Target Range Based on Neonatal Maturity: Demonstration of a Decision Tree Analytic.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of two SpO alarm strategies during automated FiO control in the NICU: a randomized crossover study.评价两种 SpO2 报警策略在新生儿重症监护病房自动 FiO2 控制中的作用:一项随机交叉研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2019 May 6;19(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1496-5.
2
Pulse Oximetry Targets in Extremely Premature Infants and Associated Mortality: One-Size May Not Fit All.极早早产儿的脉搏血氧饱和度目标与相关死亡率:一刀切可能并不适用。
J Nat Sci. 2018;4(6).
3
Admission Hyperoxia Is a Risk Factor for Mortality in Pediatric Intensive Care.吸氧过度是儿科重症监护死亡率的一个危险因素。
基于新生儿成熟度确定最佳氧饱和度目标范围:决策树分析的论证
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;13(21):3312. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13213312.
4
Management of oxygen saturation monitoring in preterm newborns in the NICU: the Italian picture.NICU 中早产儿血氧饱和度监测管理:意大利现状。
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 May 3;47(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01050-3.
5
How Do We Monitor Oxygenation during the Management of PPHN? Alveolar, Arterial, Mixed Venous Oxygen Tension or Peripheral Saturation?在持续性肺动脉高压(PPHN)管理过程中,我们如何监测氧合作用?是监测肺泡氧分压、动脉血氧分压、混合静脉血氧分压还是外周血氧饱和度?
Children (Basel). 2020 Oct 13;7(10):180. doi: 10.3390/children7100180.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Aug;19(8):699-704. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001630.
4
Hypoxemic and hyperoxemic likelihood in pulse oximetry ranges: NICU observational study.脉搏血氧饱和度范围内低氧血症和高氧血症的可能性:NICU 观察性研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 May;104(3):F274-F279. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314448. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
Association Between Oxygen Saturation Targeting and Death or Disability in Extremely Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration.新生儿氧合前瞻性荟萃分析协作组:氧饱和度目标值与极早产儿死亡或残疾的相关性。
JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2190-2201. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5725.
6
Reducing Alarm Fatigue in Two Neonatal Intensive Care Units through a Quality Improvement Collaboration.通过一项质量改进合作,减少两家新生儿重症监护病房的报警疲劳。
Am J Perinatol. 2018 Nov;35(13):1311-1318. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1653945. Epub 2018 May 21.
7
Oxygen Exposure Resulting in Arterial Oxygen Tensions Above the Protocol Goal Was Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.吸氧使动脉血氧分压高于预设目标与急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的临床转归恶化相关。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):517-524. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002886.
8
Alarm Safety and Alarm Fatigue.警报安全与警报疲劳
Clin Perinatol. 2017 Sep;44(3):713-728. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
9
Video Analysis of Factors Associated With Response Time to Physiologic Monitor Alarms in a Children's Hospital.儿童医院生理监测警报响应时间相关因素的视频分析
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Jun 1;171(6):524-531. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.5123.
10
Oxygen saturation targeting by pulse oximetry in the extremely low gestational age neonate: a quixotic quest.极低出生体重儿通过脉搏血氧饱和度仪进行氧饱和度目标设定:一场不切实际的探索。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2017 Apr;29(2):153-158. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000458.