Smits Mark M, Tonneijck Lennart, Muskiet Marcel H A, Hoekstra Trynke, Kramer Mark H H, Diamant Michaela, van Raalte Daniël H
Diabetes Center, Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Diabetes Center, Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Feb;124:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.12.011. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
To assess the effects of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors on postprandial haemodynamics.
57 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean±SD age 62.8±6.9years; BMI 31.8±4.1kg/m; HbA 7.3±0.6%) were included in an acute (exenatide- or placebo-infusion) and 12-week (liraglutide, sitagliptin or placebo) randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Systemic haemodynamics (oscillometric technique and finger photoplethysmography), vascular stiffness (tonometry), and sympathetic nervous system (SNS)-activity (heart rate variability) were determined in the fasting state and following a standardised mixed meal.
In both studies, postprandial blood pressure (BP) decreased during placebo-intervention. Compared with placebo, acute exenatide-infusion increased postprandial diastolic BP (6.7 [95%-confidence interval 3.6-9.9]mmHg, p<0.001) and vascular resistance (683.6 [438.5-928.8]dyns/cm/1.73m, p<0.001), while cardiac index decreased (0.6 [0.40.8]L/min/1.73m; p<0.001). Systolic BP, augmentation index and SNS-activity were unaffected. Twelve-week liraglutide-treatment did not affect postprandial haemodynamics, while sitagliptin decreased diastolic BP (3.5 [0.0-6.9] mmHg; p=0.050), vascular resistance (309.9 [66.6-553.1]dyns/cm/1.73m; p=0.013) and cardiac index (0.3 [0.0-0.6]L/min/1.73m; p=0.040), compared with placebo. Neither liraglutide nor sitagliptin affected SNS-activity or augmentation index. All treatments significantly lowered postprandial glucose levels.
Acute exenatide-infusion prevented the meal-induced decline in diastolic BP, although prolonged liraglutide intervention did not affect postprandial haemodynamics. The meal-induced drop in BP was augmented during sitagliptin-treatment.
评估胰高血糖素样肽(GLP)-1受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶(DPP)-4抑制剂对餐后血流动力学的影响。
57例2型糖尿病患者(平均年龄±标准差为62.8±6.9岁;体重指数31.8±4.1kg/m²;糖化血红蛋白7.3±0.6%)被纳入一项急性(艾塞那肽或安慰剂输注)和为期12周(利拉鲁肽、西他列汀或安慰剂)的随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验。在空腹状态和标准化混合餐后,采用示波测量技术和手指光电容积脉搏波描记法测定全身血流动力学、血管硬度(眼压测量法)和交感神经系统(SNS)活性(心率变异性)。
在两项研究中,安慰剂干预期间餐后血压(BP)均下降。与安慰剂相比,急性输注艾塞那肽可使餐后舒张压升高(6.7[95%置信区间3.6 - 9.9]mmHg,p<0.001),血管阻力增加(683.6[438.5 - 928.8]dyns/cm/1.73m²,p<0.001),而心脏指数降低(0.6[0.4 - 0.8]L/min/1.73m²;p<0.001)。收缩压、增强指数和SNS活性未受影响。12周的利拉鲁肽治疗未影响餐后血流动力学,而与安慰剂相比,西他列汀可降低舒张压(3.5[0.0 - 6.9]mmHg;p = 0.050)、血管阻力(309.9[66.6 - 553.1]dyns/cm/1.73m²;p = 0.013)和心脏指数(0.3[0.0 - 0.6]L/min/1.73m²;p = 0.040)。利拉鲁肽和西他列汀均未影响SNS活性或增强指数。所有治疗均显著降低餐后血糖水平。
急性输注艾塞那肽可防止餐后舒张压下降,尽管长期使用利拉鲁肽干预并未影响餐后血流动力学。西他列汀治疗期间,餐后血压下降幅度增大。