Fuchs P C, Jones R N, Barry A L
St. Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, Oregon 97225.
J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Nov;27(11):2475-81. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.11.2475-2481.1989.
There are at least four different existing or proposed interpretive criteria for the disk diffusion susceptibility testing of ticarcillin and ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid (T/C). To assess these criteria, 570 gram-negative bacillary isolates were tested for susceptibility to ticarcillin and T/C by both disk diffusion and broth microdilution methods. These included 53 strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae selected for ticarcillin resistance and high-level beta-lactamase production. The broth microdilution test results were more influenced by increased beta-lactamase production than were disk diffusion results. In the absence of published data indicating which of the two standardized test methods better predicts clinical response, we conclude that until such data are available the more conservative National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards tentative criteria for tests with members of the Enterobacteriaceae are appropriate. Our data do not support the use of separate T/C interpretive criteria for Pseudomonas spp. and members of the Enterobacteriaceae. The appropriateness of different interpretive criteria needs further evaluation.
对于替卡西林及替卡西林加克拉维酸(T/C)的纸片扩散法药敏试验,至少存在四种不同的现有或提议的解释标准。为评估这些标准,采用纸片扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法对570株革兰氏阴性杆菌分离株进行了替卡西林和T/C的药敏试验。其中包括53株因对替卡西林耐药且产高水平β-内酰胺酶而挑选出的肠杆菌科菌株。与纸片扩散法结果相比,肉汤微量稀释试验结果受β-内酰胺酶产量增加的影响更大。在缺乏表明两种标准化试验方法中哪种能更好预测临床反应的已发表数据的情况下,我们得出结论,在获得此类数据之前,对于肠杆菌科成员的试验,更保守的美国国家临床实验室标准委员会暂行标准是合适的。我们的数据不支持对铜绿假单胞菌属和肠杆菌科成员使用不同的T/C解释标准。不同解释标准的适用性需要进一步评估。