From the Stephenson Cardiac Imaging Centre (Y.M., B.H., C.P.L., A.G.H., J.W.) and Department of Cardiac Sciences (Y.M., B.H., M.P., C.P.L., A.G.H., J.W.), Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Canada; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada (B.H., C.P.L., A.G.H., J.W.); and Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada (U.J., F.A., M.Z., M.B., J.S., R.Y.).
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004067.
Left ventricular ejection fraction remains the primary risk stratification tool used in the selection of patients for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. However, this solitary marker fails to identify a substantial portion of patients experiencing sudden cardiac arrest. In this study, we examined the incremental value of considering right ventricular ejection fraction for the prediction of future arrhythmic events in patients with systolic dysfunction using the gold standard of cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Three hundred fourteen consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance were followed for the primary outcome of sudden cardiac arrest or appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Blinded quantification of left ventricular and right ventricular (RV) volumes was performed from standard cine imaging. Quantification of fibrosis from late gadolinium enhancement imaging was incrementally performed. RV dysfunction was defined as right ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%. Among all patients (164 ischemic cardiomyopathy, 150 nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy), the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 32±12% (range, 6-54%) with mean right ventricular ejection fraction of 48±15% (range, 7-78%). At a median of 773 days, 49 patients (15.6%) experienced the primary outcome (9 sudden cardiac arrest, 40 appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies). RV dysfunction was independently predictive of the primary outcome (hazard ratio=2.98; P=0.002). Among those with a left ventricular ejection fraction >35% (N=121; mean left ventricular ejection fraction, 45±6%), RV dysfunction provided an adjusted hazard ratio of 4.2 (P=0.02).
RV dysfunction is a strong, independent predictor of arrhythmic events. Among patients with mild to moderate LV dysfunction, a cohort greatly contributing to global sudden cardiac arrest burden, this marker provides robust discrimination of high- versus low-risk subjects.
左心室射血分数仍然是用于选择植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗患者的主要风险分层工具。然而,这个单一的指标并不能识别出相当一部分经历心脏性猝死的患者。在这项研究中,我们使用心血管磁共振的金标准,研究了考虑右心室射血分数对预测收缩功能障碍患者未来心律失常事件的增量价值。
连续 314 例接受心血管磁共振检查的缺血性心肌病或非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者进行了随访,主要终点为心脏性猝死或适当的植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗。使用标准电影成像对左心室和右心室(RV)容积进行盲法定量。使用钆延迟增强成像进行纤维化的增量定量。RV 功能障碍定义为右心室射血分数≤45%。在所有患者(164 例缺血性心肌病,150 例非缺血性扩张型心肌病)中,平均左心室射血分数为 32±12%(范围 6-54%),平均右心室射血分数为 48±15%(范围 7-78%)。中位数为 773 天,49 例患者(15.6%)发生主要终点事件(9 例心脏性猝死,40 例适当的植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗)。RV 功能障碍是主要终点事件的独立预测因素(危险比=2.98;P=0.002)。在左心室射血分数>35%的患者中(N=121;平均左心室射血分数为 45±6%),RV 功能障碍的调整后的危险比为 4.2(P=0.02)。
RV 功能障碍是心律失常事件的一个强有力的独立预测因素。在左心室射血分数轻度至中度下降的患者中,这一标志物对高危和低危患者具有很好的区分能力,而这些患者对全球心脏性猝死负担的贡献最大。