Suppr超能文献

个体化物理治疗方案与团体治疗对急性和亚急性机械性颈部疼痛患者颈部疼痛及功能障碍的疗效比较

[Effectiveness of an individualised physiotherapy program versus group therapy on neck pain and disability in patients with acute and subacute mechanical neck pain].

作者信息

Antúnez Sánchez Leonardo Gregorio, de la Casa Almeida María, Rebollo Roldán Jesús, Ramírez Manzano Antonio, Martín Valero Rocío, Suárez Serrano Carmen

机构信息

Centro de Especialidades Dr. Fleming, Área sanitaria Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España.

Departamento de Fisioterapia, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2017 Aug-Sep;49(7):417-425. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2016.09.010. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy in reducing neck pain and disability in an individualised physiotherapy treatment with group treatment in acute and subacute mechanical neck pain.

DESIGN

Randomised clinical trial.

LOCATION

Health Area of University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 90 patients diagnosed with mechanical neck pain of up to one month onset, distributed randomly into two groups: (i)individualised treatment; (ii)group treatment.

INTERVENTION

The treatment consisted of 15 sessions of about 60minutes for both groups. Individual treatment consisted of 15minutes of infrared heat therapy, 17minutes of massage, and analytical passive stretching of the trapezius muscles and angle of the scapula. The group treatment consisted of a program of active mobilisation, isometric contractions, self-stretching, and postural recommendations.

MAIN MEASURES

Pain was measured at the beginning and end of treatment pain using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and an algometer applied on the trapezius muscles and angle of the scapula, and neck disability using the Neck Disability Index.

RESULTS

Both treatments were statistically significant (P<.001) in improving all variables. Statistically significant differences (P<.001) were found for all of them in favour of individualised treatment compared to group treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute or subacute mechanical neck pain experienced an improvement in pain and neck disability after receiving either of the physiotherapy treatments used in our study, with the individual treatment being more effective than collective.

摘要

目的

比较个体化物理治疗与团体治疗对急性和亚急性机械性颈痛患者减轻颈部疼痛及功能障碍的疗效。

设计

随机临床试验。

地点

西班牙塞维利亚罗西奥圣母大学医院健康区。

参与者

共90例诊断为发病不超过1个月的机械性颈痛患者,随机分为两组:(i)个体化治疗组;(ii)团体治疗组。

干预

两组治疗均为15节,每节约60分钟。个体化治疗包括15分钟红外线热疗、17分钟按摩以及斜方肌和肩胛角的分析性被动拉伸。团体治疗包括主动活动、等长收缩、自我拉伸及姿势建议方案。

主要测量指标

治疗开始和结束时,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和应用于斜方肌和肩胛角的痛觉计测量疼痛,使用颈部功能障碍指数测量颈部功能障碍。

结果

两种治疗在改善所有变量方面均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。与团体治疗相比,个体化治疗在所有变量上均有统计学显著差异(P<0.001),且均更具优势。

结论

急性或亚急性机械性颈痛患者在接受本研究中使用的任何一种物理治疗后,疼痛和颈部功能障碍均有所改善,其中个体化治疗比团体治疗更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2ad/6876041/bb1120e9ad6e/fx1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验