Kavoussi Nicholas L, Hofer Matthias D, Viers Boyd R, Cordon Billy H, Mooney Ryan P, Pagliara Travis J, Scott Jeremy M, Morey Allen F
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Sex Med. 2017 Feb;14(2):264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
Synchronous ipsilateral high submuscular placement of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) pressure-regulating balloons (PRBs) and inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) reservoirs in a single submuscular tunnel is a novel strategy that could be advantageous for patients who have had major pelvic surgery.
To report our initial experience with synchronous ipsilateral vs bilateral placement of AUS PRBs and IPP reservoirs in men undergoing implant surgery.
We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing synchronous AUS and IPP placement from 2007 through 2015 by a single surgeon at our tertiary center. Patients were stratified according to ipsilateral vs bilateral placement of the AUS PRB and IPP reservoir.
Reoperation rates because of infectious or erosive complications and mechanical failure were assessed.
Of the 968 implant surgeries during the study period, 47 men had synchronous device placement, of whom 17 (36%) underwent ipsilateral placement of the PRB and reservoir. During a median follow-up of 19 months (range = 1-84 months), reoperations were necessary in 12 of 47 (26%) and were similar between groups (ipsilateral, 5 of 17, 29%; bilateral, 7 of 30, 23%; P = .73). Most reoperations were due to AUS-related complications (10 of 12, 83%) and nearly all patients with reoperation (10 of 12, 83%) had compromised urethras (ie, prior urethral surgery, radiation, or prior AUS implantation). The most common indication for reintervention was cuff erosion (4 of 47, 9%), with no difference between groups (ipsilateral, 3 of 17, 18%; bilateral, 1 of 30, 3%; P = .13).
Synchronous ipsilateral high submuscular placement of urologic prosthetic balloons could safely facilitate prosthetic surgery in patients with a history of major pelvic and inguinal surgery.
在单个肌下隧道中同步将人工尿道括约肌(AUS)压力调节球囊(PRB)和可膨胀阴茎假体(IPP)储液囊同侧高位置于肌下是一种新策略,对接受过重大盆腔手术的患者可能有益。
报告我们在接受植入手术的男性中同步同侧与双侧放置AUS PRB和IPP储液囊的初步经验。
我们回顾性分析了2007年至2015年期间在我们三级中心由单一外科医生进行同步AUS和IPP植入的所有患者。根据AUS PRB和IPP储液囊的同侧与双侧放置情况对患者进行分层。
评估因感染或侵蚀性并发症及机械故障导致的再次手术率。
在研究期间的968例植入手术中,47名男性进行了同步装置植入,其中17例(36%)进行了PRB和储液囊的同侧放置。在中位随访19个月(范围 = 1 - 84个月)期间,47例中有12例(26%)需要再次手术,两组之间相似(同侧,17例中的5例,29%;双侧,30例中的7例,23%;P = 0.73)。大多数再次手术是由于与AUS相关的并发症(12例中的10例,83%),几乎所有接受再次手术的患者(12例中的10例,83%)尿道均有损伤(即既往尿道手术、放疗或既往AUS植入)。再次干预最常见的指征是袖带侵蚀(47例中的4例,9%),两组之间无差异(同侧,17例中的3例,18%;双侧,30例中的1例,3%;P = 0.13)。
对于有重大盆腔和腹股沟手术史的患者,同步同侧高位肌下放置泌尿外科假体球囊可安全地促进假体手术。