Werthel Jean-David, Hatta Taku, Schoch Bradley, Cofield Robert, Sperling John W, Elhassan Bassem T
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr;26(4):635-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.020. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of periprosthetic infection after primary shoulder arthroplasty (SA) in patients undergoing previous nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery compared with those without previous surgery.
All patients undergoing primary SA at our institution between 1970 and 2012 were included in this study. The cohort consisted of 4577 patients treated with 2890 total SAs, 1233 hemiarthroplasties, and 454 reverse SAs; 813 (18%) patients had undergone prior nonarthroplasty shoulder surgery on the operative side. Patients with and without previous surgery were compared for postoperative periprosthetic infection. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used.
Deep postoperative infection of the shoulder was diagnosed in 68 patients (1.49%). Of the 813 patients who had undergone previous surgery, 20 (2.46%) developed a deep postoperative infection. However, of the 3764 patients who did not have previous shoulder surgery, 48 patients (1.28%) sustained deep shoulder infection. This difference was significant in both the univariate (P = .0094) and multivariate analyses (P = .0390). In addition, older age and female gender were significantly associated with a lower risk of deep postoperative infection (P = .0150 and P = .0074, respectively). A higher number of previous surgeries was also significantly associated with an increased risk of deep postoperative infection (P = .0272).
The risk of infection after primary SA is significantly higher in patients with a history of prior non-arthroplasty-related surgery. This finding should be discussed with the patients before their surgery, and potential preoperative and intraoperative workup should be undertaken to identify at-risk patients.
本研究的目的是确定与未接受过肩部手术的患者相比,接受过非关节置换肩部手术的患者在初次肩关节置换术(SA)后发生假体周围感染的风险。
本研究纳入了1970年至2012年间在本机构接受初次SA的所有患者。该队列包括4577例患者,共进行了2890例全肩关节置换术、1233例半肩关节置换术和454例反式肩关节置换术;813例(18%)患者在手术侧接受过非关节置换肩部手术。比较有和没有既往手术史的患者术后假体周围感染情况。采用单因素和多因素分析。
68例患者(1.49%)被诊断为术后肩部深部感染。在813例接受过既往手术的患者中,20例(2.46%)发生了术后深部感染。然而,在3764例未接受过肩部手术的患者中,48例(1.28%)发生了肩部深部感染。这种差异在单因素分析(P = 0.0094)和多因素分析(P = 0.0390)中均具有统计学意义。此外,年龄较大和女性与术后深部感染风险较低显著相关(分别为P = 0.0150和P = 0.0074)。既往手术次数较多也与术后深部感染风险增加显著相关(P = 0.0272)。
有非关节置换相关手术史的患者在初次SA后发生感染的风险显著更高。这一发现应在手术前与患者进行讨论,并应进行潜在的术前和术中检查以识别高危患者。