Neeley Ryan A, Diaz Miguel A, Gorman R Allen, Frankle Mark A, Mighell Mark A
Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A.
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research & Education, Tampa, Florida, U.S.A.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 6;3(5):e1263-e1272. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.04.005. eCollection 2021 Oct.
To present an alternative arthroscopic rip-stop technique with a single suture tape weaved through the tendon from anterior to posterior and to biomechanically test its strength against a control technique consisting of a single-row repair with simple sutures.
This was a controlled biomechanical study. Dissection and harvesting of the supraspinatus muscle-tendon unit were performed along the cable in 9 matched-pair cadaveric shoulders. Samples were divided into 2 groups: simple suture repair only (SSR) and simple suture repair with rip-stop (SSPR). Biomechanical testing was performed with an initial preload, followed by cyclic loading and then ramp to failure. Peak-to-peak displacement, stiffness (in newtons per millimeter), load at failure (in newtons), and failure mechanism were recorded. Data were compared using the paired-sample test.
The average peak-to-peak displacement for SSR samples was not significantly different from that of SSPR samples ( = .96). Similarly, elongation in the SSR and SSPR groups was not significantly different ( = .82). Stiffness was significantly different between the SSR and SSPR groups ( = .0054): SSR samples were less stiff than SSPR samples. Moreover, SSR samples failed at significantly lower forces than did SSPR samples ( = .028). A larger percentage of failures occurred due to tendon cut-through among SSR samples versus suture breakage among SSPR samples.
An alternative rip-stop technique is presented in this biomechanical model that may assist surgeons to better deal with difficult rotator cuff repairs. Weaving a suture tape as a rip-stop can increase stiffness, achieve higher failure loads when compared with simple suture repair with no rip-stop, and reduce tendon cut-through.
This study provides insight into a variation of rip-stop stitch techniques that may help solve the clinical problem of failure occurring at the suture-tendon interface, specifically tendon cut-through.
介绍一种替代性关节镜下防撕裂技术,即使用单根缝线带从前向后穿过肌腱,并对其强度进行生物力学测试,与由简单缝线进行的单排修复的对照技术进行比较。
这是一项对照生物力学研究。在9对匹配的尸体肩部沿腱索进行冈上肌肌腱单元的解剖和取材。样本分为2组:仅简单缝线修复(SSR)和带防撕裂的简单缝线修复(SSPR)。进行生物力学测试时,先施加初始预负荷,然后进行循环加载,接着逐渐增加负荷直至失效。记录峰峰值位移、刚度(以牛顿每毫米为单位)、失效时的负荷(以牛顿为单位)以及失效机制。使用配对样本检验比较数据。
SSR样本的平均峰峰值位移与SSPR样本的平均峰峰值位移无显著差异(P = 0.96)。同样,SSR组和SSPR组的伸长也无显著差异(P = 0.82)。SSR组和SSPR组之间的刚度存在显著差异(P = 0.0054):SSR样本的刚度低于SSPR样本。此外,SSR样本在显著更低的力下失效,低于SSPR样本(P = 0.028)。与SSPR样本中的缝线断裂相比,SSR样本中因肌腱切断导致的失效百分比更高。
在这个生物力学模型中提出了一种替代性防撕裂技术,这可能有助于外科医生更好地处理困难的肩袖修复。与不带防撕裂的简单缝线修复相比,编织缝线带作为防撕裂装置可增加刚度,实现更高的失效负荷,并减少肌腱切断。
本研究深入探讨了防撕裂缝合技术的一种变体,这可能有助于解决缝线 - 肌腱界面处出现的临床失效问题,特别是肌腱切断问题。