Mc Namara Kevin P, Peterson Gregory M, Hughes Josie, Krass Ines, Versace Vincent, Clark Robyn A, Dunbar James
Deakin Rural Health, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Unit for Medicines Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Pharmacy, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Jul;26(7):667-676. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
Population screening and monitoring of cardiovascular risk is suboptimal in Australian primary care. The role of community pharmacy has increased considerably, but without any policy framework for development. The aim of this study was to explore the nature of community pharmacy-based screening models in Australia, capacity to increase delivery of pharmacy screening, and barriers and enablers to increasing capacity.
An online survey weblink was emailed to pharmacy managers at every quality-accredited pharmacy in Australia by the Quality Pharmacy Care Program. The 122-item survey explored the nature of screening services, pharmacy capacity to deliver services, and barriers and enablers to service delivery in considerable detail. Adaptive questioning was used extensively to reduce the participant burden. Pharmacy location details were requested to facilitate geo-coding and removal of duplicate entries. A descriptive analysis of responses was undertaken.
There were 294 valid responses from 4890 emails, a 6% response rate. Most pharmacies (79%) had private counselling areas. Blood pressure assessment was nearly universal (96%), but other common risk factor assessments were offered by a minority. Most did not charge for assessments, and 59% indicated capacity to provide multiple risk factor assessments. Fewer than one in five (19%) reported any formal arrangements with general practice for care coordination. Financial viability was perceived as a key barrier to service expansion, amid concerns of patient willingness to pay. Support from government and non-governmental organisations for their role was seen as necessary.
There appears to be a critical mass of pharmacies engaging in evidence-based and professional services. Considerable additional support appears required to optimise performance across the profession.
澳大利亚初级医疗保健中对心血管风险的人群筛查和监测并不理想。社区药房的作用已大幅增加,但却没有任何发展的政策框架。本研究的目的是探讨澳大利亚基于社区药房的筛查模式的性质、增加药房筛查服务提供的能力以及增加能力的障碍和促进因素。
质量药房护理项目通过电子邮件将在线调查问卷链接发送给澳大利亚每一家获得质量认证药房的药房经理。这份包含122个项目的调查问卷详细探讨了筛查服务的性质、药房提供服务的能力以及服务提供的障碍和促进因素。广泛使用适应性提问以减轻参与者负担。要求提供药房位置详情以便进行地理编码和删除重复条目。对回复进行了描述性分析。
从4890封电子邮件中获得了294份有效回复,回复率为6%。大多数药房(79%)设有私人咨询区域。血压评估几乎普及(96%),但少数药房提供其他常见风险因素评估。大多数药房对评估不收费,59%表示有能力提供多种风险因素评估。不到五分之一(19%)的药房报告与全科医疗有任何正式的护理协调安排。在担心患者支付意愿的情况下,财务可行性被视为服务扩展的关键障碍。政府和非政府组织对其作用的支持被认为是必要的。
似乎有相当数量的药房参与了基于证据的专业服务。整个行业似乎需要大量额外支持以优化表现。