Mc Namara Kevin, Alzubaidi Hamzah, Jackson John Keith
School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia,
Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia,
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2019 Feb 4;8:1-11. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S133088. eCollection 2019.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading cause of death globally. This article explores the evidence surrounding community pharmacist interventions to reduce cardiovascular events and related mortality and to improve the management of CVD risk factors. We summarize a range of systematic reviews and leading randomized controlled trials and provide critical appraisal. Major observations are that very few trials directly measure clinical outcomes, potentially owing to a range of challenges in this regard. By contrast, there is an extensive, high-quality evidence to suggest that improvements can be achieved for key CVD risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, tobacco use, and elevated hemoglobin A1c. The heterogeneity of interventions tested and considerable variation of the context under which implementation occurred suggest that caution is warranted in the interpretation of meta-analyses. It is highly important to generate evidence for pharmacist interventions in developing countries where a majority of the global CVD burden will be experienced in the near future. A growing capacity for clinical registry trials and data linkage might allow future research to collect clinical outcomes data more often.
心血管疾病(CVDs)是全球主要的死亡原因。本文探讨了社区药剂师干预措施在减少心血管事件及相关死亡率、改善心血管疾病危险因素管理方面的相关证据。我们总结了一系列系统评价和主要的随机对照试验,并进行了批判性评估。主要观察结果是,由于这方面存在一系列挑战,很少有试验直接测量临床结局。相比之下,有大量高质量证据表明,对于高血压、血脂异常、吸烟和糖化血红蛋白升高这些关键的心血管疾病危险因素,可以实现改善。所测试干预措施的异质性以及实施干预措施的背景存在相当大的差异,这表明在解释荟萃分析时需谨慎。在发展中国家为药剂师干预措施提供证据非常重要,因为在不久的将来,全球大部分心血管疾病负担将出现在这些国家。临床注册试验和数据关联能力的不断提高,可能使未来的研究更频繁地收集临床结局数据。