Gungor Hasan, Gundogdu Mustafa, Alkurt Murat, Yesil Duymus Zeynep
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University.
Dent Mater J. 2017 Mar 31;36(2):168-173. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-023. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different polymerization cycles on the flexural strengths and microhardness of two denture base materials (Meliodent and Paladent). Heat-polymerized acrylic resin specimens (65.0 mm long×10.0 mm wide×2.5 mm in height) were prepared using different short and long polymerization cycles. After the specimens had been polymerized, they were stored in distilled water at 37±1°C for 24 h. Flexural strength test was performed at a cross-head speed of 5 mm/min and Vickers microhardness was measured. Data were analyzed with a 1-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey test, and Student t-test (α=0.05). The flexural strengths and microhardness were significantly different between Meliodent and Paladent (p<0.05). Significant differences were found among the polymerization cycles in terms of flexural strengths and microhardness (p<0.05). Polymerization with G cycle may be suggested for Meliodent and H cycle may be suggested for Paladent.
本研究的目的是评估不同聚合周期对两种义齿基托材料(Meliodent和Paladent)的弯曲强度和显微硬度的影响。使用不同的短聚合周期和长聚合周期制备热固化丙烯酸树脂试件(长65.0 mm×宽10.0 mm×高2.5 mm)。试件聚合后,在37±1°C的蒸馏水中储存24小时。以5 mm/min的十字头速度进行弯曲强度测试,并测量维氏显微硬度。数据采用单因素方差分析,随后进行Tukey检验和Student t检验(α=0.05)。Meliodent和Paladent之间的弯曲强度和显微硬度存在显著差异(p<0.05)。在弯曲强度和显微硬度方面,聚合周期之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。对于Meliodent,可能建议采用G周期聚合;对于Paladent,可能建议采用H周期聚合。