• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Using effective connectivity analyses to understand processing architecture: Response to commentaries by Samuel, Spivey and McQueen, Eisner and Norris.

作者信息

Gow David W, Olson Bruna B

机构信息

Neuropsychology Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St., rm 2030, Boston, MA 02114 ; Department of Psychology, Salem State University, 352 Lafayette St., Salem, MA 01970 ; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging. Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 Thirteenth St., S2301, Charlestown, MA.02129 ; Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., E25-519, Cambridge, MA 02139.

University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655.

出版信息

Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(7):869-875. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1192656. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1080/23273798.2016.1192656
PMID:28090547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5232413/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Using effective connectivity analyses to understand processing architecture: Response to commentaries by Samuel, Spivey and McQueen, Eisner and Norris.运用有效连接分析来理解加工架构：对塞缪尔、斯皮维、麦奎因、艾斯纳和诺里斯评论的回应
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(7):869-875. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1192656. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
2
Phonetic Recalibration in Audiovisual Speech视听言语中的语音重新校准
3
Does perceptual learning in speech reflect changes in phonetic category representation or decision bias?语音中的知觉学习反映的是语音类别表征的变化还是决策偏差？
Percept Psychophys. 2008 May;70(4):604-18. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.4.604.
4
Trajectories emerging from discrete versus continuous processing models in phonological competitor tasks: a commentary on Spivey, Grosjean, and Knoblich (2005).语音竞争任务中离散与连续加工模型产生的轨迹：对斯皮维、格罗斯让和克诺布利希（2005年）的评论
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Apr;35(2):588-94. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.2.588.
5
Revealing the Dynamic Brain Connectivity from Perception of Speech Sound to Semantic Processing by EEG.通过 EEG 揭示从语音感知到语义处理的动态大脑连通性。
Neuroscience. 2019 Sep 1;415:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
6
Does Signal Degradation Affect Top-Down Processing of Speech?信号退化会影响言语的自上而下加工吗？
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;894:297-306. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_31.
7
Is speech perception modular or interactive?言语感知是模块化的还是交互式的？
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jan;8(1):3-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.018.
8
The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.信噪比在语义判断任务中对语言加工的影响：一项关于衰老的研究
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Mar;28(3):209-221. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16025.
9
Top-down effects of syntactic sentential context on phonetic processing.句法句子语境对语音处理的自上而下的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 May;42(5):730-41. doi: 10.1037/a0039965. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
10
The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing.句子语义语境在口语单词处理中的作用轨迹。
Cognition. 1989 Jun;32(1):25-64. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90013-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Sentential influences on acoustic-phonetic processing: A Granger causality analysis of multimodal imaging data.句子对声学语音处理的影响：多模态成像数据的格兰杰因果分析
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016;31(7):841-855. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1029498. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
2
Précis of After Phrenology: Neural Reuse and the Interactive Brain.颅相学之后：神经再利用与互动的大脑
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e120. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X15000631. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
3
Lexical mediation of phonotactic frequency effects on spoken word recognition: A Granger causality analysis of MRI-constrained MEG/EEG data.语音配列频率效应在口语单词识别中的词汇中介作用：基于MRI约束的MEG/EEG数据的格兰杰因果分析
J Mem Lang. 2015 Jul 1;82:41-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.004.
4
Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.关注工作记忆中的项目：刷新与记忆搜索密切相关的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1001-6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0755-6.
5
Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus.人类上颞回中的语音特征编码。
Science. 2014 Feb 28;343(6174):1006-10. doi: 10.1126/science.1245994. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
6
Rules from words: a dynamic neural basis for a lawful linguistic process.从词语中得出的规则：语言过程中具有法律性的动态神经基础。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 21;9(1):e86212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086212. eCollection 2014.
7
Memory mechanisms supporting syntactic comprehension.支持句法理解的记忆机制。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):243-68. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0369-9.
8
New levels of language processing complexity and organization revealed by granger causation.格兰杰因果关系揭示了语言处理复杂度和组织的新层次。
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 19;3:506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00506. eCollection 2012.
9
The cortical organization of lexical knowledge: a dual lexicon model of spoken language processing.词汇知识的皮质组织：口语处理的双重词汇模型。
Brain Lang. 2012 Jun;121(3):273-88. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
10
Evidence for a double dissociation of articulatory rehearsal and non-articulatory maintenance of phonological information in human verbal working memory.人类言语工作记忆中语音信息的发音复述和非发音维持的双重分离证据。
Neuropsychobiology. 2012;65(3):133-40. doi: 10.1159/000332335. Epub 2012 Feb 24.