Allen K A, Bredero B, Van Damme T, Ulrich D A, Simons J
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, O&N IV, bus 1510, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, 1402 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Mar;47(3):813-833. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-3005-0.
The validity and reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development-3 (TGMD-3) were measured, taking into consideration the preference for visual learning of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The TGMD-3 was administered to 14 children with ASD (4-10 years) and 21 age-matched typically developing children under two conditions: TGMD-3 traditional protocol, and TGMD-3 visual support protocol. Excellent levels of internal consistency, test-retest, interrater and intrarater reliability were achieved for the TGMD-3 visual support protocol. TGMD-3 raw scores of children with ASD were significantly lower than typically developing peers, however, significantly improved using the TGMD-3 visual support protocol. This demonstrates that the TGMD-3 visual support protocol is a valid and reliable assessment of gross motor performance for children with ASD.
考虑到自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童对视觉学习的偏好,对《粗大运动发展测试第三版》(TGMD - 3)的有效性和可靠性进行了测量。在两种条件下,对14名4至10岁的ASD儿童和21名年龄匹配的发育正常儿童进行了TGMD - 3测试:TGMD - 3传统方案和TGMD - 3视觉支持方案。TGMD - 3视觉支持方案在内部一致性、重测、评分者间和评分者内信度方面均达到了优秀水平。ASD儿童的TGMD - 3原始分数显著低于发育正常的同龄人,但使用TGMD - 3视觉支持方案后有显著提高。这表明TGMD - 3视觉支持方案是评估ASD儿童粗大运动表现的有效且可靠的方法。