Suppr超能文献

使用《粗大运动发育测试-2》进行评分者间信度评估。

Interrater reliability assessment using the Test of Gross Motor Development-2.

作者信息

Barnett Lisa M, Minto Christine, Lander Natalie, Hardy Louise L

机构信息

School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Australia.

School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Australia.

出版信息

J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Nov;17(6):667-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to examine interrater reliability of the object control subtest from the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 by live observation in a school field setting.

DESIGN

Reliability Study--cross sectional.

METHODS

Raters were rated on their ability to agree on (1) the raw total for the six object control skills; (2) each skill performance and (3) the skill components. Agreement for the object control subtest and the individual skills was assessed by an intraclass correlation (ICC) and a kappa statistic assessed for skill component agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 37 children (65% girls) aged 4-8 years (M = 6.2, SD = 0.8) were assessed in six skills by two raters; equating to 222 skill tests. Interrater reliability was excellent for the object control subset (ICC = 0.93), and for individual skills, highest for the dribble (ICC = 0.94) followed by strike (ICC = 0.85), overhand throw (ICC = 0.84), underhand roll (ICC = 0.82), kick (ICC = 0.80) and the catch (ICC = 0.71). The strike and the throw had more components with less agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the overall subtest score and individual skill agreement was good, some skill components had lower agreement, suggesting these may be more problematic to assess. This may mean some skill components need to be specified differently in order to improve component reliability.

摘要

目的

旨在通过在学校操场环境中进行现场观察,检验《粗大运动发育测试第二版》中物体控制子测试的评分者间信度。

设计

信度研究——横断面研究。

方法

评估评分者在以下方面达成一致的能力:(1)六种物体控制技能的原始总分;(2)每项技能表现;(3)技能组成部分。通过组内相关系数(ICC)评估物体控制子测试和各项技能的一致性,并使用kappa统计量评估技能组成部分的一致性。

结果

两名评分者对37名4至8岁儿童(65%为女孩,平均年龄M = 6.2岁,标准差SD = 0.8)的六项技能进行了评估,共计222次技能测试。物体控制子测试的评分者间信度极佳(ICC = 0.93),各项技能中,运球的信度最高(ICC = 0.94),其次是击球(ICC = 0.85)、过肩投掷(ICC = 0.84)、下手滚球(ICC = 0.82)、踢(ICC = 0.80)和接球(ICC = 0.71)。击球和投掷的组成部分较多,一致性较低。

结论

尽管总体子测试分数和各项技能的一致性良好,但一些技能组成部分的一致性较低,这表明这些部分可能更难评估。这可能意味着需要对一些技能组成部分进行不同的界定,以提高组成部分的信度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验