Patel Amit A, Strome Marshall, Blitzer Andrew
Head and Neck Surgical Group, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2017 May;127(5):1032-1035. doi: 10.1002/lary.26472. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
Current methods of obtaining esophageal cytology include brush biopsy and blind balloon sampling, among others. These methods can be time-consuming if performed in accordance with acknowledged standards. Further, exact site localization can prove to be difficult. We describe a novel device for esophageal sampling using an esophageal balloon with debriding strips contained within the pleats of the balloon. Inflation brings the latter in contact with the surface to be sampled. Cell capture was compared with the commonly used brush technique in a pig model.
Separate balloon and standard brush cytology samples were collected from a pig model. Smear and cell pellet preparations were compared regarding cell density and total volume.
Adequate samples were obtained with both the brush and balloon. On the cell smear preparations, the cell density was greater when obtained with balloon sampling. Further, the cell pellet volume was significantly greater with the latter as well. The intact morphology of individual rafts of squamous epithelial cells also was comparable between the two methods. In addition, the balloon provided precise mapping of the cytology sites in contrast to the standard brush technique.
We present an innovative new balloon technology for esophageal sampling, which demonstrated a decreased sampling time interval, precise mapping, and increased cellular volume when compared to a commonly used brush technique.
NA. Laryngoscope, 127:1032-1035, 2017.
目前获取食管细胞学样本的方法包括刷检活检和盲式气囊采样等。如果按照公认标准操作,这些方法可能耗时较长。此外,准确的部位定位可能很困难。我们描述了一种新型食管采样装置,该装置使用带有清创条的食管气囊,清创条包含在气囊褶皱内。充气可使清创条与待采样表面接触。在猪模型中,将该装置的细胞捕获情况与常用的刷检技术进行了比较。
从猪模型中分别采集气囊和标准刷检的细胞学样本。比较涂片和细胞沉淀样本的细胞密度和总体积。
刷检和气囊采样均获得了足够的样本。在细胞涂片样本中,气囊采样获得的细胞密度更高。此外,气囊采样的细胞沉淀体积也显著更大。两种方法获取的鳞状上皮细胞单个片层的完整形态也相当。此外,与标准刷检技术相比,气囊能提供细胞学采样部位的精确图谱。
我们展示了一种用于食管采样的创新型气囊技术,与常用的刷检技术相比,该技术采样时间间隔更短、定位精确且细胞体积更大。
无。《喉镜》,2017年,第127卷,第1032 - 1035页。