Croake Sarah, Brown Jonathan D, Miller Dean, Darter Nathan, Patel Milesh M, Liu Junqing, Scholle Sarah Hudson
Ms. Croake, Dr. Brown, Mr. Miller, and Mr. Darter are with Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, D.C., and Ann Arbor, Michigan (e-mail:
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Jun 1;68(6):566-572. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500529. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
This study examined whether characteristics of Medicaid beneficiaries were associated with receipt of follow-up care after discharge from the emergency department (ED) following a visit for mental or substance use disorders.
Medicaid fee-for-service claims from 15 states and the District of Columbia in 2008 were used to calculate whether adults received follow-up (seven and 30 days) after being discharged from the ED following a visit for mental disorders (N=31,952 discharges) or substance use disorders (N=13,337 discharges). Random-effects logistic regression was used to model the odds of receiving follow-up as a function of beneficiary characteristics.
Receipt of follow-up varied widely across states and by beneficiary characteristics. The odds of seven- and 30-day follow-up after mental health ED discharges were lower among males; African Americans versus whites; and beneficiaries who qualified for Medicaid on the basis of income rather than disability, beneficiaries with depression and other mood disorders compared with other psychiatric diagnoses, and (at seven-day follow-up) beneficiaries who lived in rural versus metropolitan areas. In contrast, the odds of follow-up after substance use disorder ED discharges were lower among whites (seven-day follow-up) and among beneficiaries who qualified for Medicaid on the basis of disability rather than income, who were diagnosed as having drug use disorders rather than alcohol use disorders, or who lived in metropolitan versus suburban areas (seven- and 30-day follow-ups).
State Medicaid programs have an opportunity to improve follow-up after ED visits for mental and substance use disorders, perhaps by focusing on groups of beneficiaries who are less likely to receive follow-up.
本研究探讨了医疗补助受益人的特征与因精神或物质使用障碍就诊后从急诊科出院接受后续护理之间是否存在关联。
利用2008年来自15个州和哥伦比亚特区的医疗补助按服务收费索赔数据,计算成年人在因精神障碍(N = 31,952例出院)或物质使用障碍(N = 13,337例出院)从急诊科出院后是否接受了后续护理(7天和30天)。采用随机效应逻辑回归模型,将接受后续护理的几率作为受益人的特征函数进行建模。
后续护理的接受情况因州和受益人特征而异。在男性、非裔美国人与白人之间,以及基于收入而非残疾资格获得医疗补助的受益人、患有抑郁症和其他情绪障碍的受益人(与其他精神疾病诊断相比),以及(在7天随访时)居住在农村地区与大都市地区的受益人中,精神科急诊科出院后7天和30天接受后续护理的几率较低。相比之下,在白人中(7天随访),以及基于残疾而非收入资格获得医疗补助的受益人、被诊断为患有药物使用障碍而非酒精使用障碍的受益人,或居住在大都市地区与郊区的受益人中(7天和30天随访),物质使用障碍急诊科出院后接受后续护理的几率较低。
州医疗补助计划有机会改善精神和物质使用障碍患者急诊科就诊后的后续护理,或许可以关注那些不太可能接受后续护理的受益人群体。