RAND Corporation, Statistics Group (L Parast, Q Burkhart, A Tolpadi), Santa Monica, Calif.
RAND Corporation, Statistics Group (L Parast, Q Burkhart, A Tolpadi), Santa Monica, Calif.
Acad Pediatr. 2022 Apr;22(3S):S92-S99. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.03.005.
To develop and test a new quality measure assessing timeliness of follow-up mental health care for youth presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suicidal ideation or self-harm.
Based on a conceptual framework, evidence review, and a modified Delphi process, we developed a quality measure assessing whether youth 5 to 17 years old evaluated for suicidal ideation or self-harm in the ED and discharged to home had a follow-up mental health care visit within 7 days. The measure was tested in 4 geographically dispersed states (California, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee) using Medicaid administrative data. We examined measure feasibility of implementation, variation, reliability, and validity. To test validity, adjusted regression models examined associations between quality measure scores and subsequent all-cause and same-cause hospital readmissions/ED return visits.
Overall, there were 16,486 eligible ED visits between September 1, 2014 and July 31, 2016; 53.5% of eligible ED visits had an associated mental health care follow-up visit within 7 days. Measure scores varied by state, ranging from 26.3% to 66.5%, and by youth characteristics: visits by youth who were non-White, male, and living in an urban area were significantly less likely to be associated with a follow-up visit within 7 days. Better quality measure performance was not associated with decreased reutilization.
This new ED quality measure may be useful for monitoring and improving the quality of care for this vulnerable population; however, future work is needed to establish the measure's predictive validity using more prevalent outcomes such as recurrence of suicidal ideation or deliberate self-harm.
开发和测试一种新的质量衡量标准,用于评估因自杀意念或自伤而到急诊科就诊的青年接受后续心理健康护理的及时性。
基于概念框架、证据审查和改良 Delphi 流程,我们开发了一种质量衡量标准,用于评估在急诊科接受自杀意念或自伤评估并出院回家的 5 至 17 岁青少年是否在 7 天内进行了后续心理健康护理就诊。该衡量标准在加利福尼亚州、宾夕法尼亚州、南卡罗来纳州和田纳西州等 4 个地理分散的州使用医疗补助管理数据进行了测试。我们考察了实施的可行性、变异性、可靠性和有效性。为了检验有效性,调整后的回归模型检验了质量衡量标准得分与随后的全因和同因住院再入院/急诊科复诊之间的关联。
总体而言,2014 年 9 月 1 日至 2016 年 7 月 31 日期间,有 16486 次符合条件的急诊科就诊;在符合条件的急诊科就诊中,有 53.5%在 7 天内进行了相关的心理健康护理随访。各州的得分差异较大,从 26.3%到 66.5%不等,且与青少年的特征有关:非裔、男性和居住在城市地区的青少年就诊者不太可能在 7 天内进行后续就诊。更好的质量衡量标准表现与减少再利用无关。
这种新的急诊科质量衡量标准可能有助于监测和改善对这一弱势群体的护理质量;然而,需要进一步的工作来建立该衡量标准使用更常见的结果(如自杀意念或故意自伤的复发)的预测有效性。