Yang Li, Zhang Jiaxu, Xie Jing, Ma Xinyou, Zhang Linyao, Zhao Chenyang, Hase William L
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology , Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China.
Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota , Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
J Phys Chem A. 2017 Feb 9;121(5):1078-1085. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.6b09546. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
Anti-E2, syn-E2, inv-, and ret-S2 reaction channels for the gas-phase reaction of F + CHCHI were characterized with a variety of electronic structure calculations. Geometrical analysis confirmed synchronous E2-type transition states for the elimination of the current reaction, instead of nonconcerted processes through E1cb-like and E1-like mechanisms. Importantly, the controversy concerning the reactant complex for anti-E2 and inv-S2 paths has been clarified in the present work. A positive barrier of +19.2 kcal/mol for ret-S2 shows the least feasibility to occur at room temperature. Negative activation energies (-16.9, -16.0, and -4.9 kcal/mol, respectively) for inv-S2, anti-E2, and syn-E2 indicate that inv-S2 and anti-E2 mechanisms significantly prevail over the eclipsed elimination. Varying the leaving group for a series of reactions F + CHCHY (Y = F, Cl, Br, and I) leads to monotonically decreasing barriers, which relates to the gradually looser TS structures following the order F > Cl > Br > I. The reactivity of each channel nearly holds unchanged except for the perturbation between anti-E2 and inv-S2. RRKM calculation reveals that the reaction of the fluorine ion with ethyl iodide occurs predominately via anti-E2 elimination, and the inv-S2 pathway is suppressed, although it is energetically favored. This phenomenon indicates that, in evaluating the competition between E2 and S2 processes, the kinetic or dynamical factors may play a significant role. By comparison with benchmark CCSD(T) energies, MP2, CAM-B3LYP, and M06 methods are recommended to perform dynamics simulations of the title reaction.
通过多种电子结构计算对F + CHCHI气相反应的反式-E2、顺式-E2、内消旋-和反转-S2反应通道进行了表征。几何分析证实了当前反应消除过程中存在同步E2型过渡态,而非通过类似E1cb和E1机制的非协同过程。重要的是,本工作澄清了关于反式-E2和内消旋-S2路径反应物络合物的争议。反转-S2的 +19.2 kcal/mol正势垒表明在室温下发生的可能性最小。内消旋-S2、反式-E2和顺式-E2的负活化能(分别为 -16.9、-16.0和 -4.9 kcal/mol)表明内消旋-S2和反式-E2机制明显优于重叠消除。对一系列反应F + CHCHY(Y = F、Cl、Br和I)改变离去基团会导致势垒单调降低,这与TS结构按F > Cl > Br > I的顺序逐渐变松有关。除了反式-E2和内消旋-S2之间的微扰外,每个通道的反应活性几乎保持不变。RRKM计算表明,氟离子与碘乙烷的反应主要通过反式-E2消除发生,尽管内消旋-S2途径在能量上更有利,但该途径受到抑制。这一现象表明,在评估E2和S2过程之间的竞争时,动力学或动力学因素可能起重要作用。通过与基准CCSD(T)能量进行比较,建议使用MP2、CAM-B3LYP和M06方法对标题反应进行动力学模拟。