McDonald Katherine E, Conroy Nicole E, Olick Robert S, Panel The Project Ethics Expert
Katherine E. McDonald and Nicole E. Conroy, Syracuse University.
Robert S. Olick, SUNY Upstate Medical University; and the.
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017 Jan;122(1):78-92. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.78.
Scientific advances can improve the lives of adults with intellectual disability, yet concerns that research participation may impose harm impede scientific progress. What counts as harmful can be subjective and perceptions of harm may vary among stakeholders. We studied perspectives on the harmfulness of research events among adults with intellectual disability, family members and friends, disability service providers, researchers, and Institutional Review Board members. We found considerable variance. For example, adults with intellectual disability see exclusion from research as more harmful, but most psychosocial harms as less significant than others. All stakeholders agree that having someone else make the participation decision is harmful. Findings provide insights into the concept of harm and ethical research with adults with intellectual disability.
科学进步能够改善成年智障人士的生活,然而,对研究参与可能带来伤害的担忧阻碍了科学进步。什么算作有害可能是主观的,而且不同利益相关者对伤害的认知也可能不同。我们研究了成年智障人士、家庭成员和朋友、残疾服务提供者、研究人员以及机构审查委员会成员对研究事件有害性的看法。我们发现存在相当大的差异。例如,成年智障人士认为被排除在研究之外更具伤害性,但大多数心理社会伤害在他们看来不如其他人认为的那么严重。所有利益相关者都认同让他人做出参与决策是有害的。研究结果为伤害概念以及针对成年智障人士的伦理研究提供了见解。