• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What's the Harm? Harms in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.有什么危害?针对成年智障人士的研究中的危害。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017 Jan;122(1):78-92. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.78.
2
A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability: Do stakeholders agree?一项关于成年人智力残疾者参与研究的态度的定量研究:利益相关者是否达成一致?
Disabil Health J. 2018 Jul;11(3):345-350. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
3
Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.这值得吗?对成年智障者进行研究的益处。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec;54(6):440-453. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.440.
4
Is Safety in the Eye of the Beholder? Safeguards in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.美在观者眼中,安全亦是如此?针对成年智障人士的研究保障措施。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Dec;11(5):424-438. doi: 10.1177/1556264616651182. Epub 2016 Jul 31.
5
"We want respect": adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities address respect in research.“我们想要尊重”:智力和发育障碍成年人在研究中探讨尊重问题。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jul;117(4):263-74. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.263.
6
"You can't be cold and scientific": community views on ethical issues in intellectual disability research.“你不能冷漠且只讲科学”:社区对智力残疾研究中伦理问题的看法
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):196-208. doi: 10.1177/1556264615575512. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
7
How the powerful decide: access to research participation by those at the margins.权力者如何做出决定:边缘群体参与研究的机会
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Sep;42(1-2):79-93. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9192-x.
8
Gatekeepers of science: attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability.科学的守门人:对成年智障者参与研究的态度
Am J Ment Retard. 2008 Nov;113(6):466-78. doi: 10.1352/2008.113:466-478.
9
Co-research with adults with intellectual disability: A systematic review.与成年智障者的合作研究:一项系统综述。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;31(5):669-686. doi: 10.1111/jar.12435. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
10
Participatory research, people with intellectual disabilities and ethical approval: making reasonable adjustments to enable participation.参与式研究、智障人士与伦理批准:做出合理调整以促进参与
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Feb;24(3-4):573-81. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12702. Epub 2014 Sep 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Inclusion of Individuals with Autism and Co-Occurring Intellectual Disability or Language Impairment as Research Participants.将患有自闭症以及同时存在智力残疾或语言障碍的个体纳入研究参与者。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Sep;55(9):3410-3415. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06905-w. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Risks and Safeguards in Social-Behavioural Research With Adults With Developmental Disabilities: A Qualitative Systematic Review.针对成年发育障碍患者的社会行为研究中的风险与保障措施:一项定性系统综述
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Mar;38(2):e70031. doi: 10.1111/jar.70031.
3
A Scoping Review of the Ways Gatekeepers May Hinder or Promote Opportunities for People With Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities to Learn About Research Participation.关于把关人可能阻碍或促进智力和/或发育障碍者了解研究参与机会方式的范围综述
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 May;69(5):329-344. doi: 10.1111/jir.13216. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
4
Beyond Individual Responsibility: Group Harms in Genomic (Data-Centric) Research Ethics Require Structural, Justice-Oriented Solutions.超越个人责任:基因组(以数据为中心)研究伦理中的群体伤害需要以结构正义为导向的解决方案。
Am J Bioeth. 2025 Feb;25(2):77-79. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2441719. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
5
Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability.为大学健康研究敞开大门:增加智力残疾个体可及性的建议。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 10;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01730-4.
6
Health and Access to Health Services for People with Disability in Australia: Data and Data Gaps.澳大利亚残疾人的健康和获得卫生服务的情况:数据和数据差距。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 8;18(21):11705. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111705.
7
Facilitating the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as direct respondents in research: Strategies for fostering trust, respect, accessibility and engagement.促进智障成年人作为直接受访者参与研究:培养信任、尊重、可及性和参与度的策略。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 Jan;35(1):170-178. doi: 10.1111/jar.12936. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
A survey study of the attitudes and experiences of adults with intellectual disability regarding participation in research.一项关于成年智障人士参与研究的态度和经验的调查研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Oct;65(10):941-948. doi: 10.1111/jir.12877. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
9
The Alzheimer's Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome: Rationale and methodology.阿尔茨海默病生物标志物联盟-唐氏综合征:原理与方法
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2020 Aug 3;12(1):e12065. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12065. eCollection 2020.
10
Negative association of perceived risk and willingness to participate in innovative psychiatric research protocols.感知风险与参与创新性精神科研究方案的意愿之间的负相关关系。
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Mar;122:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.12.010. Epub 2019 Dec 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.这值得吗?对成年智障者进行研究的益处。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec;54(6):440-453. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.440.
2
Public preferences and the challenge to genetic research policy.公众偏好与基因研究政策面临的挑战。
J Law Biosci. 2014 Feb 4;1(1):52-67. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lst001. eCollection 2014 Mar.
3
Is Safety in the Eye of the Beholder? Safeguards in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.美在观者眼中,安全亦是如此?针对成年智障人士的研究保障措施。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Dec;11(5):424-438. doi: 10.1177/1556264616651182. Epub 2016 Jul 31.
4
"You can't be cold and scientific": community views on ethical issues in intellectual disability research.“你不能冷漠且只讲科学”:社区对智力残疾研究中伦理问题的看法
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):196-208. doi: 10.1177/1556264615575512. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
5
Out of sight, out of mind? The inclusion and identification of people with intellectual disability in public health research.眼不见,心不烦?公共卫生研究中智力残疾者的纳入与识别
Perspect Public Health. 2015 Jul;135(4):204-11. doi: 10.1177/1757913914552583. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
6
To include or not to include? That is the ethical question.纳入还是不纳入?这是个伦理问题。
J Intellect Disabil. 2014 Sep;18(3):209-210. doi: 10.1177/1744629514543863. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
7
A critical assessment of supported decision-making for persons aging with intellectual disabilities.支持决策在智力障碍老年人中的应用:批判性评估
Disabil Health J. 2014 Jan;7(1 Suppl):S40-3. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
8
Where are persons with intellectual disabilities in medical research? A survey of published clinical trials.医学研究中的智力残疾者在哪里?已发表临床试验的调查。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Sep;58(9):800-9. doi: 10.1111/jir.12091. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
9
The human rights context for ethical requirements for involving people with intellectual disability in medical research.涉及智力残疾者参与医学研究的伦理要求的人权背景。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2012 Nov;56(11):1122-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01617.x.
10
"We want respect": adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities address respect in research.“我们想要尊重”:智力和发育障碍成年人在研究中探讨尊重问题。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jul;117(4):263-74. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.263.

有什么危害?针对成年智障人士的研究中的危害。

What's the Harm? Harms in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.

作者信息

McDonald Katherine E, Conroy Nicole E, Olick Robert S, Panel The Project Ethics Expert

机构信息

Katherine E. McDonald and Nicole E. Conroy, Syracuse University.

Robert S. Olick, SUNY Upstate Medical University; and the.

出版信息

Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017 Jan;122(1):78-92. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.78.

DOI:10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.78
PMID:28095059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5568892/
Abstract

Scientific advances can improve the lives of adults with intellectual disability, yet concerns that research participation may impose harm impede scientific progress. What counts as harmful can be subjective and perceptions of harm may vary among stakeholders. We studied perspectives on the harmfulness of research events among adults with intellectual disability, family members and friends, disability service providers, researchers, and Institutional Review Board members. We found considerable variance. For example, adults with intellectual disability see exclusion from research as more harmful, but most psychosocial harms as less significant than others. All stakeholders agree that having someone else make the participation decision is harmful. Findings provide insights into the concept of harm and ethical research with adults with intellectual disability.

摘要

科学进步能够改善成年智障人士的生活,然而,对研究参与可能带来伤害的担忧阻碍了科学进步。什么算作有害可能是主观的,而且不同利益相关者对伤害的认知也可能不同。我们研究了成年智障人士、家庭成员和朋友、残疾服务提供者、研究人员以及机构审查委员会成员对研究事件有害性的看法。我们发现存在相当大的差异。例如,成年智障人士认为被排除在研究之外更具伤害性,但大多数心理社会伤害在他们看来不如其他人认为的那么严重。所有利益相关者都认同让他人做出参与决策是有害的。研究结果为伤害概念以及针对成年智障人士的伦理研究提供了见解。