• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Facilitating the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as direct respondents in research: Strategies for fostering trust, respect, accessibility and engagement.促进智障成年人作为直接受访者参与研究:培养信任、尊重、可及性和参与度的策略。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 Jan;35(1):170-178. doi: 10.1111/jar.12936. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
2
A survey study of the attitudes and experiences of adults with intellectual disability regarding participation in research.一项关于成年智障人士参与研究的态度和经验的调查研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Oct;65(10):941-948. doi: 10.1111/jir.12877. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
3
Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability.为大学健康研究敞开大门:增加智力残疾个体可及性的建议。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 10;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01730-4.
4
Responsible inclusion: A systematic review of consent to social-behavioral research with adults with intellectual disability in the US.负责任的纳入:对美国具有智力残疾的成年人参与社会行为研究的同意进行的系统评价。
Disabil Health J. 2024 Oct;17(4):101669. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101669. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
5
Maximising engagement and participation of intellectual disability staff in research: Insights from conducting a UK-wide survey.最大限度地提高智障员工在研究中的参与度:来自英国范围内调查的见解。
J Intellect Disabil. 2021 Dec;25(4):554-566. doi: 10.1177/1744629520924141. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability: Do stakeholders agree?一项关于成年人智力残疾者参与研究的态度的定量研究:利益相关者是否达成一致?
Disabil Health J. 2018 Jul;11(3):345-350. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
7
Using a Delphi survey to gain an international consensus on the challenges of conducting trials with adults with intellectual disabilities.采用德尔菲调查法就成年人智力障碍患者临床试验所面临的挑战达成国际共识。
Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;17(2):138-146. doi: 10.1177/1740774519887168. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
"You can't be cold and scientific": community views on ethical issues in intellectual disability research.“你不能冷漠且只讲科学”:社区对智力残疾研究中伦理问题的看法
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Apr;10(2):196-208. doi: 10.1177/1556264615575512. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
9
'It's our everyday life' - The perspectives of persons with intellectual disabilities in Norway.“这就是我们的日常生活”——挪威智障人士的观点。
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Jun;24(2):143-157. doi: 10.1177/1744629518774174. Epub 2018 May 15.
10
Is Safety in the Eye of the Beholder? Safeguards in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.美在观者眼中,安全亦是如此?针对成年智障人士的研究保障措施。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Dec;11(5):424-438. doi: 10.1177/1556264616651182. Epub 2016 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Using photovoice to engage underserved children with neurodevelopmental disorders and their caregivers in health research: a mixed methods systematic review.运用照片声音法让患有神经发育障碍的弱势群体儿童及其照料者参与健康研究:一项混合方法的系统评价
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Aug 15;6:1638513. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1638513. eCollection 2025.
2
Engaging underrepresented populations in public health monitoring: strategies for people with mild intellectual disability or low literacy skills.让代表性不足的人群参与公共卫生监测:针对轻度智力残疾或低识字技能人群的策略。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jul 14;24(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02578-0.
3
A Scoping Review of the Ways Gatekeepers May Hinder or Promote Opportunities for People With Intellectual and/or Developmental Disabilities to Learn About Research Participation.关于把关人可能阻碍或促进智力和/或发育障碍者了解研究参与机会方式的范围综述
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2025 May;69(5):329-344. doi: 10.1111/jir.13216. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
4
Subcutaneous electroencephalography monitoring for people with epilepsy and intellectual disability: co-production workshops.癫痫和智力残疾患者的皮下脑电图监测:联合制作工作坊
BJPsych Open. 2024 Dec 13;11(1):e3. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2024.825.
5
Challenges and best practices for recruiting families of children with intellectual disabilities for health research.招募智障儿童家庭参与健康研究的挑战与最佳实践
J Intellect Disabil. 2024 May 16;29(3):17446295241255178. doi: 10.1177/17446295241255178.
6
Invisible: People with Disability and (In)equity in Precision Medicine Research.隐形:残疾人群体与精准医学研究中的(不)公平问题
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Mar;24(3):103-106. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2305565. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
7
Toward Equity in Research on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.迈向智力和发展障碍研究的公平性。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2023 Sep 1;128(5):350-370. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-128.5.350.

本文引用的文献

1
A survey study of the attitudes and experiences of adults with intellectual disability regarding participation in research.一项关于成年智障人士参与研究的态度和经验的调查研究。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021 Oct;65(10):941-948. doi: 10.1111/jir.12877. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
2
Inclusive approaches to developing content valid patient-reported outcome measure response scales for youth with intellectual/developmental disabilities.为智力/发育障碍青少年制定具有内容效度的患者报告结局测量反应量表的包容性方法。
Br J Learn Disabil. 2021 Mar;49(1):100-110. doi: 10.1111/bld.12346. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Creating Accessible Survey Instruments for Use with Autistic Adults and People with Intellectual Disability: Lessons Learned and Recommendations.为自闭症成年人和智障人士创建可使用的调查工具:经验教训与建议。
Autism Adulthood. 2020 Mar 1;2(1):61-76. doi: 10.1089/aut.2019.0074. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
4
From Invisible to Visible to Valued: Improving Population Health of People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.从隐形到可见再到受重视:改善智力和发育障碍者的人群健康状况
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019 Oct;57(5):476-481. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-57.5.476.
5
The AASPIRE practice-based guidelines for the inclusion of autistic adults in research as co-researchers and study participants.AASPIRE 基于实践的指南:将自闭症成年人纳入研究中,作为共同研究者和研究参与者。
Autism. 2019 Nov;23(8):2007-2019. doi: 10.1177/1362361319830523. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
6
Disability inclusion in precision medicine research: a first national survey.精准医学研究中的残疾包容:首次全国调查。
Genet Med. 2019 Oct;21(10):2319-2327. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0486-1. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
7
A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability: Do stakeholders agree?一项关于成年人智力残疾者参与研究的态度的定量研究:利益相关者是否达成一致?
Disabil Health J. 2018 Jul;11(3):345-350. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
Improving Public Health Requires Inclusion of Underrepresented Populations in Research.改善公众健康需要将代表性不足的人群纳入研究。
JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):337-338. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19138.
9
Co-research with adults with intellectual disability: A systematic review.与成年智障者的合作研究:一项系统综述。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;31(5):669-686. doi: 10.1111/jar.12435. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
10
Precision medicine, health disparities, and ethics: the case for disability inclusion.精准医学、健康差异与伦理:将残疾群体纳入考量的理由
Genet Med. 2018 Apr;20(4):397-399. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.120. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

促进智障成年人作为直接受访者参与研究:培养信任、尊重、可及性和参与度的策略。

Facilitating the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as direct respondents in research: Strategies for fostering trust, respect, accessibility and engagement.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Falk College, Syracuse, New York, USA.

Center for Court Innovation, Syracuse, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 Jan;35(1):170-178. doi: 10.1111/jar.12936. Epub 2021 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1111/jar.12936
PMID:34559449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8688267/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adults with intellectual disability experience disparities in social determinants of health and health outcomes. While new knowledge can advance health equity, adults with intellectual disability are frequently excluded from being direct respondents in research. Their inclusion requires addressing scientific and ethical challenges that contribute to their exclusion.

METHOD

We describe our multi-phased process, inclusive of community-engagement, to develop a self-report survey for adults with intellectual disability and share findings from an institutional ethnography conducted to identify strategies for facilitating inclusion. We also assessed indicators of the quality of these strategies.

RESULTS

We identified building trust, showing respect, designing in accessibility, maximising flexibility and allowing individualised accommodations as strategies that foster inclusion. Multiple indicators validate the effectiveness of these strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Researchers can promote first-person decision-making and direct research participation by focusing on promoting accessibility, trust, respect and engagement.

摘要

背景

智障成年人在健康的社会决定因素和健康结果方面存在差异。虽然新知识可以促进健康公平,但智障成年人在研究中经常被排除在直接受访者之外。他们的参与需要解决导致他们被排除在外的科学和伦理挑战。

方法

我们描述了我们的多阶段过程,包括社区参与,以开发针对智障成年人的自我报告调查,并分享为促进包容性而进行的机构民族志研究的结果。我们还评估了促进包容性的策略的质量指标。

结果

我们确定了建立信任、表示尊重、设计可访问性、最大限度地提高灵活性和允许个性化适应作为促进包容的策略。多个指标验证了这些策略的有效性。

结论

研究人员可以通过专注于促进可访问性、信任、尊重和参与来促进第一人称决策和直接参与研究。