• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“我们想要尊重”:智力和发育障碍成年人在研究中探讨尊重问题。

"We want respect": adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities address respect in research.

机构信息

Public Health, Food Studies, and Nutrition and the Burton Blatt Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.

出版信息

Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jul;117(4):263-74. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.263.

DOI:10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.263
PMID:22809073
Abstract

Respect is central to ethical guidelines for research. The scientific community has long debated, and at times disagreed on, how to demonstrate respect in research with adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. To illuminate the voices of those most affected, the author studies the views of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities on respect in research. Findings are consistent with disability rights' ideas and indicate that adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities have much to contribute to the discussion, that they value participating, and that they agree with calls to focus on human rights and dignity. Notably, participants spoke at lengths about the nature of interactions between researchers and participants. Implications are discussed, including how to infuse research standards with community-supported values and preferences.

摘要

尊重是医学研究伦理准则的核心。科学界长期以来一直在争论,有时甚至不同意如何在针对智障和发育障碍成年人的研究中表现出尊重。为了阐明那些受影响最大的人的意见,作者研究了智障和发育障碍成年人对研究中尊重的看法。研究结果与残疾人权利的理念一致,并表明智障和发育障碍成年人对讨论有很大的贡献,他们重视参与,并同意关注人权和尊严的呼吁。值得注意的是,参与者详细讨论了研究人员和参与者之间互动的性质。讨论了其影响,包括如何将社区支持的价值观和偏好融入研究标准。

相似文献

1
"We want respect": adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities address respect in research.“我们想要尊重”:智力和发育障碍成年人在研究中探讨尊重问题。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jul;117(4):263-74. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.263.
2
'You need to let your voice be heard': research participants' views on research.“你需要让你的声音被听到”:研究参与者对研究的看法。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Mar;57(3):216-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01527.x. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
3
Transformation through health teaching for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a qualitative study.通过健康教育转变智障和发育障碍成年人:一项定性研究。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Apr;50(2):129-39. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-50.02.129.
4
Trauma in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: reactions of parents and caregivers to research participation.智力和发育障碍者的创伤:父母和照顾者对参与研究的反应。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jun;50(3):199-206. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-50.3.199.
5
Doing nothing: adults with disabilities with no daily activities and their siblings.无所事事:没有日常活动的残疾成年人及其兄弟姐妹。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jan;117(1):67-79. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.67.
6
The challenges and benefits of using participant observation to understand the social interaction of adults with intellectual disabilities.运用参与式观察理解智障成年人社会互动的挑战与益处。
Augment Altern Commun. 2011 Dec;27(4):267-78. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2011.587831.
7
Factors associated with self-concept: adolescents with intellectual and development disabilities share their perspectives.与自我概念相关的因素:智障和发展障碍青少年分享他们的观点。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Feb;50(1):31-40. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-50.1.31.
8
Predictors of future caregiving by adult siblings of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.智力和发育障碍者的成年兄弟姐妹未来照顾的预测因素。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012 Jan;117(1):33-47. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.33.
9
Mental health services for adults with intellectual disabilities--what do service users and staff think of them?智力残疾成年人的心理健康服务 - 服务使用者和工作人员对此有何看法?
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Jan;26(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/jar.12007.
10
Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and participation in decision making: ethical considerations for professional-client practice.智力和发育障碍成年人参与决策:专业-客户实践的伦理考虑。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010 Apr;48(2):112-25. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-48.2.112.

引用本文的文献

1
Risks and Safeguards in Social-Behavioural Research With Adults With Developmental Disabilities: A Qualitative Systematic Review.针对成年发育障碍患者的社会行为研究中的风险与保障措施:一项定性系统综述
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Mar;38(2):e70031. doi: 10.1111/jar.70031.
2
Breaking barriers: a commentary on research gaps in cancer and depression among individuals with intellectual disabilities.打破障碍:关于智障人士癌症与抑郁症研究差距的评论
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 6;24(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02366-2.
3
Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability.
为大学健康研究敞开大门:增加智力残疾个体可及性的建议。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Sep 10;21(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01730-4.
4
Facilitating the inclusion of adults with intellectual disability as direct respondents in research: Strategies for fostering trust, respect, accessibility and engagement.促进智障成年人作为直接受访者参与研究:培养信任、尊重、可及性和参与度的策略。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 Jan;35(1):170-178. doi: 10.1111/jar.12936. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
5
Early Assessment and Support Alliance Connections: Community-Based Participatory Research to Develop a Peer-based Early Psychosis Web Resource with Young Adults.早期评估和支持联盟联系:基于社区的参与式研究,为年轻人开发基于同伴的早期精神病网络资源。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(4):471-480. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0052.
6
Development of the AASPIRE Web Accessibility Guidelines for Autistic Web Users.面向自闭症网络用户的AASPIRE网络可访问性指南的制定。
Autism Adulthood. 2019 Jun 1;1(2):146-157. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0020. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
7
Decisional Capacity for Informed Consent in Males and Females with Fragile X Syndrome.脆性 X 综合征男性和女性知情同意决策能力。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2020 May;50(5):1725-1747. doi: 10.1007/s10803-019-03930-4.
8
A quantitative study of attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability: Do stakeholders agree?一项关于成年人智力残疾者参与研究的态度的定量研究:利益相关者是否达成一致?
Disabil Health J. 2018 Jul;11(3):345-350. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
9
What's the Harm? Harms in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.有什么危害?针对成年智障人士的研究中的危害。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017 Jan;122(1):78-92. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.78.
10
Is It Worth It? Benefits in Research With Adults With Intellectual Disability.这值得吗?对成年智障者进行研究的益处。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec;54(6):440-453. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-54.6.440.