Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Instituto Nacional De Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition), Mexico City, Mexico.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Instituto Nacional De Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition), Mexico City, Mexico
Adv Nutr. 2017 Jan 17;8(1):165S-172S. doi: 10.3945/an.116.013672. Print 2017 Jan.
Some of the most relevant yet controversial issues in nutrition are those surrounding the guidelines on quality and quantity of dietary fat in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases and coronary heart diseases. Conflicting evidence questions the credibility of the previous dietary guidelines, particularly the quality of the evidence on which these recommendations were based. It is therefore important to explore the changes that have occurred in these guidelines and their influence on the adoption of different dietary patterns over time. In this review, we summarize the evolution of the fat component of the dietary guidelines, discuss controversial aspects, and highlight the areas in which additional evidence is still needed. Over the years, the scientific community has shown an obsession for calories in a diet instead of focusing on the quality of the food that makes up the diet. This is why certain authors have identified the importance of evaluating a diet focusing on diet patterns, rather than single isolated nutrients. This approach has been proposed in the most recent Dietary Guidelines for Americans.
一些在营养方面最相关但也最具争议的问题围绕着膳食脂肪的质量和数量指南展开,这些指南涉及到心血管疾病和冠心病的预防和治疗。相互矛盾的证据对以往饮食指南的可信度提出了质疑,特别是这些建议所依据的证据质量。因此,探讨这些指南的变化以及它们对不同饮食模式随时间演变的影响非常重要。在这篇综述中,我们总结了饮食指南中脂肪成分的演变,讨论了有争议的方面,并强调了仍需要更多证据的领域。多年来,科学界一直痴迷于饮食中的卡路里,而不是关注构成饮食的食物的质量。这就是为什么某些作者认为评估注重饮食模式而不是单一孤立营养素的饮食很重要。这种方法在美国最新的膳食指南中得到了提出。