• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊柱手术中的成本最小化:腰椎减压手术中进行集体团购检测是否合理?

Minimising costs in spinal surgery: is group & save testing justified in lumbar decompression surgery?

作者信息

Wilson William T, Young Adam M H, Fivey Paul

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

J Spine Surg. 2016 Dec;2(4):277-280. doi: 10.21037/jss.2016.12.13.

DOI:10.21037/jss.2016.12.13
PMID:28097244
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5233860/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar microdiscectomy and laminectomy are two of the most common neurosurgical procedures performed worldwide. Current practice still sees pre-operative group and save testing prior to this surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the need for pre-operative group and save and post-operative blood checks.

METHODS

Patient archives were reviewed to identify those undergoing primary elective lumbar decompression surgery at the Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK. Hematology results before and after surgery, whether group and save was carried out, and blood transfusion requirements, if any, were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients in total were included. Ninety-one percent of microdiscectomy patients and 95% of laminectomy patients underwent group and save testing prior to surgery. No patients received a transfusion as a result of their procedure. The mean hemoglobin drop after surgery was 11 g/L for the microdiscectomy group and 17 g/L for the laminectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings strongly suggest that pre-operative group and save is unnecessary in lumbar microdiscectomy and laminectomy. As such, we support the abandonment of routine pre-operative group and save and post-operative blood checks, with significant cost saving effects. However, O negative blood should always be available in case of major peri-operative bleeding.

摘要

背景

腰椎间盘显微切除术和椎板切除术是全球范围内最常见的两种神经外科手术。目前的做法仍然是在该手术前进行术前血型鉴定和备血检测。本研究的目的是确定术前血型鉴定和备血以及术后血液检查的必要性。

方法

回顾患者档案,以确定在英国格拉斯哥伊丽莎白女王大学医院神经科学研究所接受初次择期腰椎减压手术的患者。收集手术前后的血液学结果、是否进行了血型鉴定和备血以及输血需求(如有)。

结果

总共纳入了200例患者。91%的椎间盘显微切除术患者和95%的椎板切除术患者在手术前进行了血型鉴定和备血检测。没有患者因手术而接受输血。椎间盘显微切除术组术后平均血红蛋白下降11g/L,椎板切除术组为17g/L。

结论

我们的研究结果强烈表明,腰椎间盘显微切除术和椎板切除术中术前血型鉴定和备血是不必要的。因此,我们支持放弃常规的术前血型鉴定和备血以及术后血液检查,这具有显著的成本节约效果。然而,在围手术期大出血的情况下,应始终备有O型阴性血。

相似文献

1
Minimising costs in spinal surgery: is group & save testing justified in lumbar decompression surgery?脊柱手术中的成本最小化:腰椎减压手术中进行集体团购检测是否合理?
J Spine Surg. 2016 Dec;2(4):277-280. doi: 10.21037/jss.2016.12.13.
2
Preoperative "group and save" in lumbar microdiscectomy: is it necessary?腰椎间盘切除术的术前“分组保存”:有必要吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Dec;15(6):686-8. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11510. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
3
Group & save sampling in lumbar decompression: A review into current practice.腰椎减压术中的分组与保存采样:对当前实践的回顾。
J Perioper Pract. 2021 Jan-Feb;31(1-2):15-17. doi: 10.1177/1750458920950664. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
4
Lumbar microdiscectomy and lumbar decompression improve functional outcomes and depression scores.腰椎显微椎间盘切除术和腰椎减压术可改善功能结局和抑郁评分。
Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012 Nov;3(4):65-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328146.
5
Tubular microsurgery for lumbar discectomies and laminectomies in obese patients: operative results and outcome.管状显微镜手术治疗肥胖患者的腰椎间盘切除术和椎板切除术:手术结果和预后。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):E664-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0b63d.
6
Factors predicting hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and transfusion in patients undergoing revision posterior lumbar spine decompression, fusion, and segmental instrumentation.预测接受腰椎后路翻修减压、融合及节段性内固定手术患者住院时间、手术时间、失血量及输血情况的因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Apr 15;27(8):818-24. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00008.
7
Routine group and save unnecessary for gastric band surgery: a retrospective case review audit of 1018 bariatric patients.常规分组及保存对于胃束带手术并非必要:对1018例肥胖症患者的回顾性病例审查审计
Clin Obes. 2012 Jun;2(3-4):73-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2012.00043.x. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
8
Cost Analysis of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Diskectomy and Laminectomy Spine Surgery.腰椎间盘切除术和椎板切除术脊柱手术中脊髓麻醉与全身麻醉的成本分析
World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
9
[Lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients].
Rev Neurol. 2004;39(6):501-7.
10
Clinical outcome of microscopic lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy: clinical article.显微镜下腰椎棘突劈开式椎板切除术的临床疗效:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):187-94. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE1373. Epub 2014 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine perioperative practices and postoperative outcomes for elective lumbar laminectomies.选择性腰椎椎板切除术的围手术期常规操作及术后结果
J Spine Surg. 2018 Sep;4(3):588-593. doi: 10.21037/jss.2018.09.01.

本文引用的文献

1
Lord Carter's model hospitals aim to save the NHS £5 billion a year.卡特勋爵的模范医院旨在每年为英国国家医疗服务体系节省50亿英镑。
Nurs Stand. 2016 Feb 17;30(25):12-3. doi: 10.7748/ns.30.25.12.s14.
2
Preoperative "group and save" in lumbar microdiscectomy: is it necessary?腰椎间盘切除术的术前“分组保存”:有必要吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Dec;15(6):686-8. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11510. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
3
Are blood group and save samples needed for cholecystectomy?胆囊切除术需要血型和备血样本吗?
Surg Endosc. 2011 Aug;25(8):2505-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1573-9. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
4
Audit of blood transfusion in elective breast cancer surgery--do we need to group and save pre-operatively?择期乳腺癌手术输血情况审计——我们术前需要进行血型鉴定及血液保存吗?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Sep;90(6):472-3. doi: 10.1308/003588408X301091.
5
Perioperative results following lumbar discectomy: comparison of minimally invasive discectomy and standard microdiscectomy.腰椎间盘切除术后的围手术期结果:微创椎间盘切除术与标准显微椎间盘切除术的比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25(2):E20. doi: 10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E20.
6
Standard open microdiscectomy versus minimal access trocar microdiscectomy: results of a prospective randomized study.标准开放式显微椎间盘切除术与微创套管显微椎间盘切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究的结果
Neurosurgery. 2008 Jan;62(1):174-81; discussion 181-2. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000311075.56486.C5.
7
Comparison of open discectomy with microendoscopic discectomy in lumbar disc herniations: results of a randomized controlled trial.腰椎间盘突出症中开放性椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的结果
Neurosurgery. 2007 Sep;61(3):545-9; discussion 549. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000290901.00320.F5.
8
Use of a tubular retractor system in microscopic lumbar discectomy: 1 year prospective results in 135 patients.管状牵开器系统在显微镜下腰椎间盘切除术中的应用:135例患者的1年前瞻性研究结果
Neurosurg Focus. 2002 Aug 15;13(2):E5. doi: 10.3171/foc.2002.13.2.6.
9
Less systemic cytokine response in patients following microendoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy.与开放性腰椎间盘切除术相比,接受显微内镜腰椎间盘切除术的患者全身细胞因子反应较小。
J Orthop Res. 2005 Mar;23(2):406-11. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.010.
10
Maximum surgical blood order schedule reduces hospital costs.最大手术用血计划可降低医院成本。
Am Surg. 1987 Apr;53(4):223-5.