• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用主动学习识别与健康信息技术相关的患者安全事件。

Using Active Learning to Identify Health Information Technology Related Patient Safety Events.

作者信息

Fong Allan, Howe Jessica L, Adams Katharine T, Ratwani Raj M

机构信息

Allan Fong, National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, 3007 Tilden St. NW, Suite 7M, Washington, D.C. 20008, USA, 202-244-9807, Email:

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jan 18;8(1):35-46. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-CR-0148.

DOI:10.4338/ACI-2016-09-CR-0148
PMID:28097287
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5373751/
Abstract

The widespread adoption of health information technology (HIT) has led to new patient safety hazards that are often difficult to identify. Patient safety event reports, which are self-reported descriptions of safety hazards, provide one view of potential HIT-related safety events. However, identifying HIT-related reports can be challenging as they are often categorized under other more predominate clinical categories. This challenge of identifying HIT-related reports is exacerbated by the increasing number and complexity of reports which pose challenges to human annotators that must manually review reports. In this paper, we apply active learning techniques to support classification of patient safety event reports as HIT-related. We evaluated different strategies and demonstrated a 30% increase in average precision of a confirmatory sampling strategy over a baseline no active learning approach after 10 learning iterations.

摘要

健康信息技术(HIT)的广泛应用带来了新的患者安全隐患,这些隐患往往难以识别。患者安全事件报告是对安全隐患的自我报告描述,提供了与HIT相关的潜在安全事件的一种视角。然而,识别与HIT相关的报告可能具有挑战性,因为它们通常被归类在其他更主要的临床类别之下。报告数量的增加和复杂性给必须人工审查报告的人类注释者带来了挑战,这加剧了识别与HIT相关报告的这一难题。在本文中,我们应用主动学习技术来支持将患者安全事件报告分类为与HIT相关。我们评估了不同的策略,并证明在经过10次学习迭代后,验证性抽样策略的平均精度比无主动学习的基线方法提高了30%。

相似文献

1
Using Active Learning to Identify Health Information Technology Related Patient Safety Events.利用主动学习识别与健康信息技术相关的患者安全事件。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jan 18;8(1):35-46. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-CR-0148.
2
Identifying health information technology related safety event reports from patient safety event report databases.从患者安全事件报告数据库中识别与医疗信息技术相关的安全事件报告。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Oct;86:135-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
3
Identifying and Synchronizing Health Information Technology (HIT) Events from FDA Medical Device Reports.从美国食品药品监督管理局医疗器械报告中识别并同步健康信息技术(HIT)事件。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1048-1052.
4
Exploration and Initial Development of Text Classification Models to Identify Health Information Technology Usability-Related Patient Safety Event Reports.文本分类模型在识别与健康信息技术可用性相关的患者安全事件报告中的探索与初步开发。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):521-527. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693427. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
5
Screening Electronic Health Record-Related Patient Safety Reports Using Machine Learning.使用机器学习筛选与电子健康记录相关的患者安全报告。
J Patient Saf. 2017 Mar;13(1):31-36. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000104.
6
Generating a Health Information Technology Event Database from FDA MAUDE Reports.利用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(MAUDE)报告生成健康信息技术事件数据库。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:883-887. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190350.
7
Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems.利用 FDA 报告为健康信息技术安全问题提供分类依据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):45-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000369. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
8
Creating a database for health IT events via a hybrid deep learning model.通过混合深度学习模型创建健康信息技术事件数据库。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Oct;110:103556. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103556. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
Exploring Health Information Technology Events from FDA MAUDE Database.利用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统数据库探索健康信息技术事件
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;250:187-191.
10
Patient safety goals for the proposed Federal Health Information Technology Safety Center.拟议的联邦健康信息技术安全中心的患者安全目标。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):472-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002988. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Management and Patient Safety in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Systematic Review.人工智能时代的风险管理与患者安全:一项系统综述。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 27;12(5):549. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050549.
2
Engineering and clinical use of artificial intelligence (AI) with machine learning and data science advancements: radiology leading the way for future.随着机器学习和数据科学的进步,人工智能(AI)的工程应用与临床应用:放射学引领未来之路。
Ther Adv Urol. 2021 Sep 20;13:17562872211044880. doi: 10.1177/17562872211044880. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
Use of machine learning in geriatric clinical care for chronic diseases: a systematic literature review.机器学习在老年慢性病临床护理中的应用:一项系统文献综述
JAMIA Open. 2020 Oct 8;3(3):459-471. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa034. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
An Evidence-Based Tool for Safe Configuration of Electronic Health Records: The eSafety Checklist.基于证据的电子健康记录安全配置工具:eSafety 清单。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Oct;9(4):817-830. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675210. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
5
Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology.机器学习在放射学中的当前应用和未来影响。
Radiology. 2018 Aug;288(2):318-328. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018171820. Epub 2018 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Computerized prescriber order entry-related patient safety reports: analysis of 2522 medication errors.计算机化医嘱录入相关患者安全报告:对2522例用药差错的分析
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 1;24(2):316-322. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw125.
2
Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework.通过健康信息技术衡量和改善患者安全:健康信息技术安全框架。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr;25(4):226-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004486. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
3
Active learning: a step towards automating medical concept extraction.主动学习:迈向医学概念提取自动化的一步。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):289-96. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv069. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
4
An Evaluation of Patient Safety Event Report Categories Using Unsupervised Topic Modeling.使用无监督主题建模对患者安全事件报告类别进行评估
Methods Inf Med. 2015;54(4):338-45. doi: 10.3414/ME15-01-0010. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
5
Exploring the sociotechnical intersection of patient safety and electronic health record implementation.探索患者安全与电子健康记录实施的社会技术交叉点。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb;21(e1):e28-34. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001762. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
6
Using statistical text classification to identify health information technology incidents.利用统计文本分类识别健康信息技术事件。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):980-5. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001409. Epub 2013 May 10.
7
Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems.利用 FDA 报告为健康信息技术安全问题提供分类依据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):45-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000369. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
8
Towards an integrative cognitive-socio-technical approach in health informatics: analyzing technology-induced error involving health information systems to improve patient safety.迈向健康信息学中的综合认知-社会技术方法:分析涉及健康信息系统的技术引发的错误以提高患者安全。
Open Med Inform J. 2010 Sep 15;4:181-7. doi: 10.2174/1874431101004010181.
9
Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities.健康信息技术:谬误与清醒现实。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):617-23. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005637.
10
Automated categorisation of clinical incident reports using statistical text classification.使用统计文本分类对临床事件报告进行自动分类。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e55. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.036657. Epub 2010 Aug 19.