• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的电子健康记录安全配置工具:eSafety 清单。

An Evidence-Based Tool for Safe Configuration of Electronic Health Records: The eSafety Checklist.

机构信息

Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, Connecticut, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Oct;9(4):817-830. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675210. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1675210
PMID:30428487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6247819/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic health records (EHRs) are transforming the way health care is delivered. They are central to improving the quality of patient care and have been attributed to making health care more accessible, reliable, and safe. However, in recent years, evidence suggests that specific features and functions of EHRs can introduce new, unanticipated patient safety concerns that can be mitigated by safe configuration practices.

OBJECTIVE

This article outlines the development of a detailed and comprehensive evidence-based checklist of safe configuration practices for use by clinical informatics professionals when configuring hospital-based EHRs.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to synthesize evidence on safe configuration practices; data were analyzed to elicit themes of common EHR system capabilities. Two rounds of testing were completed with end users to inform checklist design and usability. This was followed by a four-member expert panel review, where each item was rated for clarity (clear, not clear), and importance (high, medium, low).

RESULTS

An expert panel consisting of three clinical informatics professionals and one health information technology expert reviewed the checklist for clarity and importance. Medium and high importance ratings were considered affirmative responses. Of the 870 items contained in the original checklist, 535 (61.4%) received 100% affirmative agreement among all four panelists. Clinical panelists had a higher affirmative agreement rate of 75.5% (656 items). Upon detailed analysis, items with 100% clinician agreement were retained in the checklist with the exception of 47 items and the addition of 33 items, resulting in a total of 642 items in the final checklist.

CONCLUSION

Safe implementation of EHRs requires consideration of both technical and sociotechnical factors through close collaboration of health information technology and clinical informatics professionals. The recommended practices described in this checklist provide systems implementation guidance that should be considered when EHRs are being configured, implemented, audited, or updated, to improve system safety and usability.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录 (EHR) 正在改变医疗保健的提供方式。它们是提高患者护理质量的核心,并且已经使医疗保健更加便捷、可靠和安全。然而,近年来的证据表明,EHR 的特定功能和特性可能会引入新的、意料之外的患者安全问题,这些问题可以通过安全配置实践来缓解。

目的

本文概述了为临床信息学专业人员在配置基于医院的 EHR 时使用而制定的详细且全面的基于证据的安全配置实践清单的开发过程。

方法

进行了文献回顾,以综合有关安全配置实践的证据;分析数据以引出常见 EHR 系统功能的主题。与最终用户进行了两轮测试,以告知清单设计和可用性。随后,由四名专家组成的小组进行了审查,对每个项目的清晰度(清晰、不清晰)和重要性(高、中、低)进行了评分。

结果

由三名临床信息学专业人员和一名健康信息技术专家组成的专家小组对清单的清晰度和重要性进行了审查。中高度重要性评分被认为是肯定的回答。在最初的清单中包含的 870 个项目中,所有四名小组成员都对 535 个(61.4%)项目达成了 100%的肯定协议。临床小组成员的肯定协议率更高,为 75.5%(656 个项目)。经过详细分析,在清单中保留了 100%的临床医生同意的项目,但排除了 47 个项目,并增加了 33 个项目,最终清单总计 642 个项目。

结论

EHR 的安全实施需要通过健康信息技术和临床信息学专业人员的密切合作考虑技术和社会技术因素。本清单中描述的推荐实践为配置、实施、审核或更新 EHR 时提供了系统实施指南,以提高系统的安全性和可用性。

相似文献

1
An Evidence-Based Tool for Safe Configuration of Electronic Health Records: The eSafety Checklist.基于证据的电子健康记录安全配置工具:eSafety 清单。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Oct;9(4):817-830. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675210. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
2
Impact of Electronic Health Records on Information Practices in Mental Health Contexts: Scoping Review.电子健康记录对心理健康环境下信息实践的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 4;24(5):e30405. doi: 10.2196/30405.
3
System Configuration Evaluation for a Province-Wide Clinical Information System Using the eSafety Checklist.利用 eSafety 清单对全省临床信息系统进行系统配置评估。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):735-742. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771392. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
Merits, features, and desiderata to be considered when developing electronic health records with embedded clinical decision support systems in Palestinian hospitals: a consensus study.在巴勒斯坦医院开发具有嵌入式临床决策支持系统的电子健康记录时应考虑的优点、特点和期望:一项共识研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0928-3.
5
A usability design checklist for Mobile electronic data capturing forms: the validation process.移动电子数据采集表单的可用性设计检查表:验证过程。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0718-3.
6
Safety Assurance Factors for Electronic Health Record Resilience (SAFER): study protocol.电子健康记录弹性的安全保障因素(SAFER)研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 12;13:46. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-46.
7
Response to: An Evidence-Based Tool for Safe Configuration of Electronic Health Records: The eSafety Checklist.回应:一种基于证据的电子健康记录安全配置工具:电子安全检查表。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Oct;9(4):831-832. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675811. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Development and validation of the guideline for reporting evidence-based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET).基于证据的实践教育干预与教学报告指南(GREET)的制定与验证
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Sep 6;16(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0759-1.
9
Development of the prototype concise safe systems checklist tool for general practice.基层医疗简明安全系统清单工具原型的研制。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05396-y.
10
Contextual Barriers to Implementing Open-Source Electronic Health Record Systems for Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.低收入和中低收入国家实施开源电子健康记录系统的背景障碍:范围审查
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 1;26:e45242. doi: 10.2196/45242.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the factors militating against the effective implementation of electronic health records (EHR) in Nigeria.评估阻碍尼日利亚有效实施电子健康记录(EHR)的因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31398. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83009-y.
2
System Configuration Evaluation for a Province-Wide Clinical Information System Using the eSafety Checklist.利用 eSafety 清单对全省临床信息系统进行系统配置评估。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Aug;14(4):735-742. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771392. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
3
Health technology, quality and safety in a learning health system.学习型健康体系中的健康技术、质量与安全。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2023 Mar;36(2):79-85. doi: 10.1177/08404704221139383. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
4
The Development and Piloting of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Evaluation Tool: Lessons Learned.《移动电子健康记录评估工具的开发和试点:经验教训》
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Jan;12(1):153-163. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722917. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
Response to: An Evidence-Based Tool for Safe Configuration of Electronic Health Records: The eSafety Checklist.回应:一种基于证据的电子健康记录安全配置工具:电子安全检查表。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Oct;9(4):831-832. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675811. Epub 2018 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Active Learning to Identify Health Information Technology Related Patient Safety Events.利用主动学习识别与健康信息技术相关的患者安全事件。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jan 18;8(1):35-46. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-CR-0148.
2
Safe Practices for Copy and Paste in the EHR. Systematic Review, Recommendations, and Novel Model for Health IT Collaboration.电子健康记录中复制粘贴的安全操作。系统评价、建议及健康信息技术协作的新模式。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jan 11;8(1):12-34. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-R-0150.
3
An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety incidents.电子健康记录相关患者安全事件分析
Health Informatics J. 2017 Jun;23(2):134-145. doi: 10.1177/1460458216631072. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
4
The SAFER guides: empowering organizations to improve the safety and effectiveness of electronic health records.《SAFER指南》:助力各机构提高电子健康记录的安全性与有效性。
Am J Manag Care. 2014 May;20(5):418-23.
5
Effects of two commercial electronic prescribing systems on prescribing error rates in hospital in-patients: a before and after study.两种商业电子医嘱系统对医院住院患者医嘱错误率的影响:一项前后对照研究。
PLoS Med. 2012 Jan;9(1):e1001164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001164. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
6
Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems.利用 FDA 报告为健康信息技术安全问题提供分类依据。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):45-53. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000369. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
7
'Global trigger tool' shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured.“全球触发工具”显示,医院中的不良事件可能比之前测量的高出十倍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):581-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190.
8
Technology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application.技术引发的错误与可用性:使用手持应用程序时可用性问题与处方错误之间的关系
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):519-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.01.003. Epub 2005 Apr 8.