Suppr超能文献

评估老年人和年轻人在现实、熟悉场景中进行接触时间判断时,视觉和听觉时间差线索与基于启发式线索的相对权重。

Estimating the relative weights of visual and auditory tau versus heuristic-based cues for time-to-contact judgments in realistic, familiar scenes by older and younger adults.

作者信息

Keshavarz Behrang, Campos Jennifer L, DeLucia Patricia R, Oberfeld Daniel

机构信息

Department of Research, iDAPT, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Apr;79(3):929-944. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1270-9.

Abstract

Estimating time to contact (TTC) involves multiple sensory systems, including vision and audition. Previous findings suggested that the ratio of an object's instantaneous optical size/sound intensity to its instantaneous rate of change in optical size/sound intensity (τ) drives TTC judgments. Other evidence has shown that heuristic-based cues are used, including final optical size or final sound pressure level. Most previous studies have used decontextualized and unfamiliar stimuli (e.g., geometric shapes on a blank background). Here we evaluated TTC estimates by using a traffic scene with an approaching vehicle to evaluate the weights of visual and auditory TTC cues under more realistic conditions. Younger (18-39 years) and older (65+ years) participants made TTC estimates in three sensory conditions: visual-only, auditory-only, and audio-visual. Stimuli were presented within an immersive virtual-reality environment, and cue weights were calculated for both visual cues (e.g., visual τ, final optical size) and auditory cues (e.g., auditory τ, final sound pressure level). The results demonstrated the use of visual τ as well as heuristic cues in the visual-only condition. TTC estimates in the auditory-only condition, however, were primarily based on an auditory heuristic cue (final sound pressure level), rather than on auditory τ. In the audio-visual condition, the visual cues dominated overall, with the highest weight being assigned to visual τ by younger adults, and a more equal weighting of visual τ and heuristic cues in older adults. Overall, better characterizing the effects of combined sensory inputs, stimulus characteristics, and age on the cues used to estimate TTC will provide important insights into how these factors may affect everyday behavior.

摘要

估计接触时间(TTC)涉及多个感觉系统,包括视觉和听觉。先前的研究结果表明,物体的瞬时视觉大小/声音强度与其视觉大小/声音强度的瞬时变化率之比(τ)驱动着TTC判断。其他证据表明,人们会使用基于启发式的线索,包括最终视觉大小或最终声压级。此前大多数研究使用的是脱离情境且不熟悉的刺激物(例如空白背景上的几何形状)。在这里,我们通过使用有车辆驶来的交通场景来评估TTC估计,以在更现实的条件下评估视觉和听觉TTC线索的权重。年轻参与者(18至39岁)和年长参与者(65岁及以上)在三种感觉条件下进行TTC估计:仅视觉、仅听觉以及视听结合。刺激物呈现在沉浸式虚拟现实环境中,并针对视觉线索(例如视觉τ、最终视觉大小)和听觉线索(例如听觉τ、最终声压级)计算线索权重。结果表明,在仅视觉条件下会使用视觉τ以及启发式线索。然而,在仅听觉条件下的TTC估计主要基于一种听觉启发式线索(最终声压级),而非听觉τ。在视听结合条件下,视觉线索总体上占主导,年轻成年人赋予视觉τ的权重最高,而年长成年人对视觉τ和启发式线索的权重分配更为均衡。总体而言,更好地描述联合感觉输入、刺激特征和年龄对用于估计TTC的线索的影响,将为这些因素如何影响日常行为提供重要见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验