• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼科住院医师通过既定里程碑评估自身表现的能力。

Ability of Ophthalmology Residents to Self-Assess Their Performance Through Established Milestones.

机构信息

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Wilmer Biostatistics Center, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2019 Jul-Aug;76(4):1076-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.12.004
PMID:30850245
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Accurate self-assessment is an important aspect of practice-based learning and improvement and a critical skill for resident growth. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandates semiannual milestones assessments by a clinical competency committee (CCC) for all ophthalmology residents. There are six core competencies: patient care (PC), medical knowledge, systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism, and interpersonal communication skills. These competencies are assessed by the milestones rubric, which has detailed behavioral anchors and are also used for trainee self-assessments. This study compares resident self-assessed (SA) and faculty CCC milestones scores.

DESIGN

Residents completed milestones self-assessments prior to receiving individual score reports from the CCC. Correlation coefficients were calculated comparing the SA and CCC scores. In addition, statistical models were used to determine predictors of disparities and differences between the SA and CCC scores.

SETTING

Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one residents in the Wilmer Ophthalmology Residency program from July 2014 to June 2016.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven self-assessments were available for the analysis. For each resident's first assessment, SA and CCC scores were strongly correlated (r ≥ 0.6 and p < 0.05) for four milestones, and not correlated for the remaining 20 milestones. In multivariable models, the SA and CCC scores are less disparate for medical knowledge and systems-based practice competencies compared to practice-based learning and improvement. Higher year of training, PC and professionalism competencies were predictive of statistically significant resident overestimation of scores relative to the CCC. In addition, higher CCC scores predicted statistically significant lower SA-CCC disparities and differences. SA-CCC differences did not lower to a significant extent with repeated assessments or modification to the end-of-rotation evaluation forms.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-assessments by ophthalmology residents are not well-correlated with faculty assessments, emphasizing the need for improved and frequent timely feedback. Residents have the greatest difficulty self-assessing their professionalism and PC competency. In general, senior residents and underperforming residents have more inaccurate self-assessments.

摘要

目的

准确的自我评估是实践学习和改进的重要方面,也是住院医师成长的关键技能。研究生医学教育认证委员会要求所有眼科住院医师每半年由临床能力委员会(CCC)进行一次里程碑式评估。有六项核心能力:患者护理(PC)、医学知识、以系统为基础的实践、基于实践的学习和改进、专业精神和人际沟通技巧。这些能力是通过里程碑式评分表进行评估的,该评分表有详细的行为锚点,也用于学员的自我评估。本研究比较了住院医师自我评估(SA)和教员 CCC 里程碑式评分。

设计

住院医师在收到 CCC 的个人评分报告之前完成里程碑式自我评估。计算 SA 和 CCC 评分之间的相关系数。此外,还使用统计模型来确定差异的预测因素以及 SA 和 CCC 评分之间的差异。

地点

威尔默眼科研究所,约翰霍普金斯医院。

参与者

2014 年 7 月至 2016 年 6 月威尔默眼科住院医师项目的 21 名住院医师。

结果

可用于分析的自我评估有 57 项。对于每位住院医师的第一次评估,SA 和 CCC 评分在四个里程碑上高度相关(r≥0.6,p<0.05),而在其余 20 个里程碑上不相关。在多变量模型中,与基于实践的学习和改进相比,医疗知识和以系统为基础的实践能力的 SA 和 CCC 评分差异较小。较高的培训年限、PC 和专业精神能力与相对于 CCC 的住院医师评分过高有关。此外,较高的 CCC 评分预测了统计学上显著的 SA-CCC 差异和差异降低。随着重复评估或对轮班结束评估表的修改,SA-CCC 差异并没有显著降低。

结论

眼科住院医师的自我评估与教员评估相关性不强,强调需要改进和频繁及时的反馈。住院医师在自我评估他们的专业精神和 PC 能力方面最困难。一般来说,资深住院医师和表现不佳的住院医师的自我评估更不准确。

相似文献

1
Ability of Ophthalmology Residents to Self-Assess Their Performance Through Established Milestones.眼科住院医师通过既定里程碑评估自身表现的能力。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jul-Aug;76(4):1076-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
2
A Multicenter Prospective Comparison of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones: Clinical Competency Committee vs. Resident Self-Assessment.毕业后医学教育认证委员会里程碑的多中心前瞻性比较:临床能力委员会与住院医师自我评估
J Surg Educ. 2017 Nov-Dec;74(6):e8-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Do Attending Surgeons and Residents See Eye To Eye? An Evaluation of the Accreditation Council For Graduate Medical Education Milestones in General Surgery Residency.主治外科医生和住院医生意见一致吗?对毕业后医学教育认证委员会普通外科住院医师培训里程碑的评估。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e54-e58. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
4
Using the ACGME Milestones for Resident Self-Evaluation and Faculty Engagement.使用美国研究生医学教育认证委员会住院医师自我评估和教员参与度的里程碑标准。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e150-e157. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.09.001.
5
Initial performance of a modified milestones global evaluation tool for semiannual evaluation of residents by faculty.教员对半年度住院医师评估的改良里程碑全球评估工具的初步表现。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Nov-Dec;70(6):739-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.08.004.
6
Differences in Resident Self-Evaluation and Clinical Competency Committee Evaluation Using ACGME Milestone Versions 1.0 and 2.0.使用 ACGME 里程碑版本 1.0 和 2.0 评估住院医师自我评价与临床能力委员会评估的差异。
J Surg Educ. 2023 Oct;80(10):1378-1384. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.07.005. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
7
Association of Gender With Learner Assessment in Graduate Medical Education.性别与研究生医学教育中学习者评估的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010888. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10888.
8
A first look at the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education anesthesiology milestones: implementation of self-evaluation in a large residency program.初探毕业后医学教育认证委员会麻醉学里程碑:在一个大型住院医师培训项目中实施自我评估
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Aug;32:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.026. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
9
Do You See What I See? A Comparison of CCC and Self-Assigned Milestones Across Military Medical Specialties.你是否看到我所看到的?军事医学专业中 CCC 与自我设定里程碑的比较。
J Surg Educ. 2024 May;81(5):647-655. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
10
How Effective are New Milestones Assessments at Demonstrating Resident Growth? 1 Year of Data.新的里程碑式评估在展示住院医师成长方面的效果如何?一年的数据。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Jan-Feb;74(1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Construct Validity Evidence for ACGME Milestones in Surgical Specialties: A Systematic Review.外科学专业住院医师培训评审委员会(ACGME)里程碑的结构效度证据:一项系统评价
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Apr;17(2):162-171. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00524.1. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Investigating the Roles and Impact of Clinical Competency Committees in Graduate Medical Education: A Narrative Review.探究临床能力委员会在毕业后医学教育中的作用及影响:一项叙述性综述
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Dec;16(6):662-683. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00017.1. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
3
Education Research: Neuroradiology Curriculum and Competencies Among Canadian Adult Neurology Residency Programs: A Cross-Sectional Study.
教育研究:加拿大成人神经病学住院医师培训项目中的神经放射学课程与能力:一项横断面研究。
Neurol Educ. 2023 Nov 6;2(4):e200096. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200096. eCollection 2023 Dec 22.
4
Differences between resident self-assessments and faculty- assessments on Anesthesiology Milestones and associated factors: a cross-sectional study.住院医师自我评估与带教老师评估在麻醉科里程碑式评估及其相关因素方面的差异:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 17;24(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05544-6.
5
Are First-Year Emergency Medicine Residents Still Behind on Level 1 Care-Based Milestones?一年级急诊医学住院医师在基于一级护理的里程碑方面是否仍然落后?
Cureus. 2023 Dec 2;15(12):e49842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49842. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Transformational leadership competency: a cross-sectional study of medical university graduates in China.变革型领导力胜任力:对中国医科大学毕业生的横断面研究。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2288307. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2288307. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
7
Resident Self-assessment and Clinical Competency Committee Evaluations in Family Medicine: A Single-Institution Study.家庭医学住院医师自我评估和临床能力委员会评估:单机构研究。
Fam Med. 2023 May;55(5):333-338. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.170761. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
8
Differences between physical therapist ratings, self-ratings, and posturographic measures when assessing static balance exercise intensity.评估静态平衡运动强度时物理治疗师评分、自我评分和姿势描记测量之间的差异。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 May 11;4:1096171. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1096171. eCollection 2023.
9
Teaching Self-directed Learning Skills Through a Resident-Led Milestones Process.通过住院医师主导的里程碑式进程教授自主学习技能。
PRiMER. 2022 Sep 21;6:321624. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2022.321624. eCollection 2022.
10
A Competency-based Tool for Resident Evaluation of Pediatric Emergency Department Faculty.一种基于能力的儿科急诊科教员住院医师评估工具。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 21;24(1):59-63. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.11.57686.